In an opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court stated, “Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts,” adding, “We have no commission to allocate political power and influence in the absence of a constitutional directive or legal standards to guide us in the exercise of such authority.”
“I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats,” explained David Lewis, a Republican member of the General Assembly’s redistricting committee. “So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country.” Districts that overwhelmingly favor one party tend to push legislators away from compromise, because they are accountable only to primary challengers, who generally come from the extreme wings of their parties. The gerrymanders were so successful in some states that although Democratic candidates in total received a substantial majority of votes, Republicans came away with a majority of legislative seats, allowing them to pass bills without fear of electoral consequences.
Some thought Roberts, a George W. Bush appointee, might be persuaded to side with the liberals on this issue, but the chief justice maintained his record of voting with the conservative wing of the court, as he did in cases restricting the scope of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 and overturning campaign contribution limits in 2010 .
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court gives Marine seeking VA benefits second chance in lower courtThe Supreme Court on Wednesday gave a Marine Corps veteran who sought disability benefits for his service-related post-traumatic stress a second chance to prevail in a case that could impact the amount of power federal agencies have.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court effectively blocks census citizenship question for now in a blow to Trump administrationThe Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a setback to the Trump administration's plans to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, effectively blocking the addition of the question for now. Partisan Supreme Court Name ? Refugee? Country--Stateless? Status-- Prison of Modrate Profession--Slavery Health__ edge of life Week of Rufugee?Or Rufusee Who is Rufused Non of Rufugee? Non of Citizen? Non of Pasajero? Non of Tourist? Non of Businessmen? Courts? Where is Court? What we are? Truth is Ahead?
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rules on conservative effort to weaken federal agenciesThank goodness. Conservatives are trying to make government -- OUR SELF GOVERNANCE -- obsolete. Glad to see the Court put a stop to this particular tactic. Peepster3 They are actually giving them the continuation of the administrative state as their enemy, as opposed to making Congress & the courts be the bad guy to conservatives. Don't buy the hype. Congress should be making regs, not the agencies.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court strikes down Tennessee liquor retail regulationsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in a case concerning alcohol regulatio... I trust Neil Gorsuch will be intellectually honest in applying his beliefs on restrictions on the 21st amendment; and apply that same principal to the 2nd. They can serve you 80% water now.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court allows partisan districts, blocks census querySupreme Court says Trump administration explanation for wanting to add citizenship question to census was “more of a distraction” than explanation. Forms are to be printed next week and it’s unclear whether the administration would have time to respond. Good....They got This one Right!! The Trump administration creating DISTRACTIONS? Now, who could imagine THAT? The census determines state funding, house representation and electoral college votes. I think that's enough of an explanation why we need a citizenship question.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court declines to put limits on partisan redistrictingThe Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling written by Chief Justice Roberts, held that congressional districting maps in North Carolina and Maryland are not... Wow. The supreme Court is now anti-American, anti-Democracy. Just wow.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »