WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court says federal courts have no role to play in policing political districts drawn for partisan gain. The decision could embolden political line-drawing for partisan gain when state lawmakers undertake the next round of redistricting following the 2020 census.
The decision was a major blow to critics of the partisan manipulation of electoral maps that can result when one party controls redistricting. Federal courts in five states concluded that redistricting plans put in place under one party’s control could go too far and that there were ways to identify and manage excessively partisan districts. Those courts included 15 federal judges appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents reaching back to Jimmy Carter.
So patently obvious and egregious efforts to dismantle representative democracy are not worthy of federal judicial review? Stepping stone to revisiting Jim Crow laws?
What exactly is your role then.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court decides federal courts cannot police gerrymanderingThe Supreme Court ruled that federal courts cannot rule in cases of partisan gerrymandering in cases from Maryland and North Carolina. NBC News' Pete Williams reports from the court steps. Maybe it's time to re-think the whole idea of a Supreme Court. They have become so partisan that they are basically useless when it comes to making non-partisan policy for United States citizens. Abolish the SCOTUS and create something new. Sad.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court allows severe partisan gerrymandering to continueThe Supreme Court said Thursday that federal courts must stay out of disputes over when politicians go too far in drawing district lines for partisan gain -- a dramatic and sweeping ruling that could fundamentally affect the balance of power in state legislatures and Congress. Enjoy Gilead
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects limits to partisan gerrymanderingIn a major blow to election reformers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected efforts to rein in the contentious practice of manipulating electoral district boundaries to entrench one party in power by turning away challenges to political maps in Maryland and North Carolina. The justices, in a
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court lets partisan gerrymanders stand in blow to (mostly) DemocratsThe Supreme Court ruled 5-4 along partisan lines that the federal courts cannot overrule state legislatures in drawing district lines, ending challenges to gerrymandered maps meant to help one party or the other.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court decides federal judges cannot block gerrymanderingThe Supreme Court rules that federal courts may not block gerrymandering in a 5-4 decision that falls along partisan lines. This is wrong. The right for representation is a federal right. Of course a majority right winged court would rule that. I say burn down the court, its no longer the Supreme Court, they are just partisan republican hacks.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »