The justices narrowed the circumstances in which courts will defer to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous language in its own regulations.
But the justices stopped short of overturning court precedent.The ruling could be a modest step in a movement to restrict federal regulatory authority, a goal of the conservative movement and the Trump administration.This story is breaking and will be updated.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Gives Businesses Wider Protections Under FOIAThe Supreme Court gave the government more leeway to block private-sector commercial or financial data, a win for the business community over media organizations and other advocates for public access. Oh good. Protect the delicate financial info of those private prisons profiting off the abuse of children with taxpayer money. of course it did. the courts are stacked and the ones that stand to benefit from this type of allowance are making the decisions...
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court to review insurers’ Obamacare claims for $12 billionThe Supreme Court will decide whether insurance companies can collect $12 billion from the federal government to cover their losses in the early years of the health care law championed by President Obama. Poor health insurance companies. No one ever thinks of their feelings. Wow, socialism for corporations again! What losses?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court strikes down stiff firearms penaltiesConservative Justice Neil Gorsuch sided with the U.S. Supreme Court&39;s four liberal members on Monday in striking down as unconstitutionally vague a law imposing stiff criminal sentences for people convicted of certain crimes involving firearms. In the 5-4 ruling, with Gorsuch&39;s fellow conservatives Must of been the firearms bit. is gorsuch the new kennedy? Was a crime with a firearm violent if the weapon was not discharged? The distinction makes a difference with respect for the time to be served.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court says law imposing extra prison time for ‘crime of violence’ is too vagueThe court ruled for two Dallas men who were convicted of robbing several convenience stores and then were given an extra 25 years in prison for carrying a sawed-off shotgun during the crime. Good SCOTUS (in the time of Trump) comes through again... even with the reactionary side of the Bench!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court blocks South Dakota newspaper from 'confidential' food stamp dataSupreme Court deals blow to advocates of greater access to public information, ruling in a 6-3 decision that the government does not have to turn over private food stamp data it obtained from grocery stores to a South Dakota newspaper. Isn’t it kind of creepy and weird that they want that type information to begin with? If people want to know who benefits from SNAP, I can assure you it's the giant grocery chains, agribusiness and their shareholders A couple hundred bucks a month puts food on a family's table Multiply it by millions and it's Wall Street getting rich So...a newspaper sued the government to find out whether or not food stamp recipients eat steak/lobster rather than spam? Thank you SCOTUS
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Brazil Supreme Court justices delay decision on Lula appealBrazil's Supreme Court on Tuesday delayed until August its decision on an a... Thanks God 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 FreeLula He will remain in jail forever! Thank God!🇧🇷
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »