The Supreme Court said Thursday the Constitution did not require tearing down historic monuments just because they featured religious symbols, such as crosses or the Ten Commandments.
Speaking for the court, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said the Maryland cross could be upheld because it served many purposes. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. Ginsburg said the cross had a “starkly sectarian message” that violated the 1st Amendment’s ban on “an establishment of religion.”
I thought the reasoning was because it had been there so long, and not a green light to erect new structures?
Can't wait for those good ol' Satan worshippers in Arkansas to start putting up their symbols all over the state now that they have a green light from SCOTUS
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court allows cross memorial in Maryland to standThe Supreme Court ruled that a cross at a World War I memorial is not a government endorsement of religion and can remain as it is. Pete Williams has details from the court steps. It's a fact of life many people believe in God AS long as Religion is Separate from State It's also a fact that in America laws are made based on religious beliefs Not a good thing Good. There are no church services held there. Everyone but Radicalized democrats know it was erected as a war memorial. It has stood in good standing for damn near a century and now has become part and parcel of where it stands. Maybe lets dig up Bob Byrd from ANC
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court allows war cross memorial to stand as symbol of 'sacrifice'JUST IN: Supreme Court rules cross in Bladensburg, Maryland, can stand, upholding constitutionality of a religious symbol on public land, but stopping short of creating a clear new standard for evaluating similar displays nationwide. Well I disagree. Inspires too much crazy. A cross has different meanings. Now a cross is universally used as a grave symbol.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross on Public Land Contains Secular MessageThe Supreme Court decided to let a 40-foot cross remain on a Maryland highway median, concluding that the memorial to World War I’s fallen heros holds a secular meaning and does not violate the constitutional separation of church and state. Excellent decision blogger bloggertemplate bloggerdesign blogspot customization More lies from media democrats people
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross On Public Land Does Not Violate ConstitutionThe challengers argued the huge Christian cross in Maryland defies the First Amendment's ban on establishing religion. JERKS Time to put up some Muslim symbols then... 😏 👍🏼🙏🏻👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🇺🇸
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court upholds Maryland 'peace cross' in church and state test caseA 40-foot-tall (12 meters) cross-shaped war memorial standing on public land in ... a cross is not solely unique to christianity ...as long as there is no 'jesus' hanging on it it can be a relatively neutral symbol Time to erect a Flying Spaghetti Monster... So I guess only Christians died fighting the Kaiser, right?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court rules giant cross to veterans on public land is not gov't endorsement of religionUS Supreme Court says huge concrete cross can stay on public land; rejects claim that its presence is an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion. I have to agree on their ruling... is a tricky one although people are exagerating... the only religious stuff we need to avoid is those pseudo evangelist trying to tell america how to live their life using their version of god and pseudo morals to pocket money Don’t people have better things to do? 🤬
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »