The Supreme Court ruled that a 40-foot World War I memorial in the shape of a Christian cross on Maryland public land does not violate the U.S. Constitution.
“Due in large part to the image of the simple wooden crosses that originally marked the graves of American soldiers killed in the war, the cross became a symbol of their sacrifice, and the design of the Bladensburg Cross must be understood in light of that background,” Alito wrote. “That the cross originated as a Christian symbol and retains that meaning in many contexts does not change the fact that the symbol took on an added secular meaning when used in World War I memorials.
“As I see it, when a cross is displayed on public property, the government may be presumed to endorse its religious content,” she wrote. “The venue is surely associated with the State; the symbol and its meaning are just as surely associated exclusively with Christianity.” Two years later, the humanist association filed a federal lawsuit against the commission on behalf of three local residents, arguing that the cross’ presence on state-owned land violated the religious freedom protected under the First Amendment.
In 2015, a federal judge ruled for the state and the American Legion. U.S. District Judge Deborah K. Chasanow found that the Peace Cross was “not a governmental endorsement of religion,” although she acknowledged that the so-called Latin cross “is undeniably a religious symbol.”
👍🏼🙏🏻👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🇺🇸
Time to put up some Muslim symbols then... 😏
JERKS
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules giant cross to veterans on public land is not gov't endorsement of religionUS Supreme Court says huge concrete cross can stay on public land; rejects claim that its presence is an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion. I have to agree on their ruling... is a tricky one although people are exagerating... the only religious stuff we need to avoid is those pseudo evangelist trying to tell america how to live their life using their version of god and pseudo morals to pocket money Don’t people have better things to do? 🤬
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross on Public Land Contains Secular MessageThe Supreme Court decided to let a 40-foot cross remain on a Maryland highway median, concluding that the memorial to World War I’s fallen heros holds a secular meaning and does not violate the constitutional separation of church and state. Excellent decision blogger bloggertemplate bloggerdesign blogspot customization More lies from media democrats people
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court upholds Maryland 'peace cross' in church and state test caseA 40-foot-tall (12 meters) cross-shaped war memorial standing on public land in ... a cross is not solely unique to christianity ...as long as there is no 'jesus' hanging on it it can be a relatively neutral symbol Time to erect a Flying Spaghetti Monster... So I guess only Christians died fighting the Kaiser, right?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court allows war cross memorial to stand as symbol of 'sacrifice'JUST IN: Supreme Court rules cross in Bladensburg, Maryland, can stand, upholding constitutionality of a religious symbol on public land, but stopping short of creating a clear new standard for evaluating similar displays nationwide. Well I disagree. Inspires too much crazy. A cross has different meanings. Now a cross is universally used as a grave symbol.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court allows cross memorial in Maryland to standThe Supreme Court ruled that a cross at a World War I memorial is not a government endorsement of religion and can remain as it is. Pete Williams has details from the court steps. It's a fact of life many people believe in God AS long as Religion is Separate from State It's also a fact that in America laws are made based on religious beliefs Not a good thing Good. There are no church services held there. Everyone but Radicalized democrats know it was erected as a war memorial. It has stood in good standing for damn near a century and now has become part and parcel of where it stands. Maybe lets dig up Bob Byrd from ANC
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
EU high court rules against Adidas in trademark caseThe EU's General Court said the company could not prove that the stripes had a distinctive enough character throughout the 28-nation bloc. Adidas had argued its famous three stripes, applied in any direction, deserve trademark protection.
Source: trtworld - 🏆 101. / 63 Read more »