In June, the Court
to take up the case, with oral argument scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 7. The Court will likely issue its decision before July 2023.In urging the Supreme Court to reinstate the gerrymandered congressional map, the North Carolina legislators are relying on an untenable misreading of the Constitution’s Elections Clause known as the The Elections Clause delegates to states the power to regulate federal elections while giving Congress the overriding authority to make or alter such laws.
Proponents of the independent state legislature theory—like the gerrymanderers—read the Elections Clause to give state legislators near-exclusive authority to regulate federal elections, prohibiting any other state entity—like state courts or governors—from placing checks and balances on that power. In this case, the gerrymanderers are arguing that the theory licenses them to violate the state constitution when drawing congressional maps, and that the state courts do not have the power to stop them.The independent state legislature theory runs contrary to the constitutional text, history, practice and precedent. state lawmakers, so much so that when they drafted the Elections Clause, they insisted that Congress retain the ultimate power to set the rules for federal elections.
The independent state legislature theory would give state legislatures wide authority to gerrymander electoral maps and pass voter suppression laws.: It would be absurd for a state legislature to be allowed to violate the very state constitution that created it. demonstrates. For these reasons, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the theory for over a century, including as recently as 2015 and 2019.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
What to know about Moore v. Harper, the high-stakes elections case before the Supreme CourtThe justices will test the 'independent state legislature theory' in a case that could have far-reaching consequences for elections. I’ll hand it to the Christian right. When they pack a court to overthrow democracy they pack a court. In other words: the religious extremist, Christofascist stacked Supreme Court will decide whether your vote will count in any election, and whether we'll continue to have a government of the people, by the people, for the people. Constitution is pretty explicit. State legislatures set up rules for elections, not courts & Feds.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case that could reshape US election lawsSupreme Court to hear arguments in a case that experts say could dramatically alter how elections are run in the U.S.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
LGBTQ Protections at Center of Supreme Court Case Pitting Free Speech Against Gay MarriageThe case comes at a time when the court is dominated 6-3 by conservatives and following a series of cases in which the justices have sided with religious plaintiffs. LGBTQ may have the people in place to win some of their battles here on earth but they will not win them in Heaven unless they repent and accept Jesus as their Savior Imagine if someone went into a black-owned business and requested a George Floyd is a Criminal cake. LGBTQ please VOTE LGB gay VoteBlue the supreme court is coming for your rights. SupremeCourt RightToProtest
Source: NBCDFW - 🏆 288. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case pitting free speech against LGBTQ rightsWhen the Supreme Court convenes for oral arguments Monday, it will be confronted with an issue it has been asked to resolve before in court fights involving bakers, a florist, and now, a web designer. Will see if the Supreme Court loses even more respectability, this should be a simple case, The State her company is registered in has a public accommodation law, but nothing is simple when the US version of the Morality Police is involved These elitist companies must have significant profits if they can pick and choose who they work for. It's not about rights. It's about an agenda.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court Weighs ‘Most Important Case’ on DemocracyThe question for the justices is whether the U.S. Constitution’s provision giving state legislatures the power to make the rules about the “times, places and manner” of congressional elections cuts state courts out of the process. The states should control elections. Federal government should not run elections. Too many crooks. Federal Government should set the election guidelines so it would be consistent across the country. State Rights should never come in to play. Why is voting and the electoral process even an issue in 2022? Because that's the way the powers that be want it.
Source: wttw - 🏆 520. / 51 Read more »