The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C., July 24, 2022.The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear arguments in a case that experts sayMoore v. Harper focuses on a dispute in North Carolina over redistricting after a voting map created by the Republican-led state legislature was struck down as violating the state constitution and then replaced by court-appointed experts.
At stake, the experts said, are thousands of laws governing everything from voter registration rules to ranked-choice voting systems and even the designation of presidential electors. "No one branch of government should have outsized power in America's system of government, and bucking this long-held tenet of our democracy would undermine people's ability to freely vote and shape the future of our communities and our country in a way that reflects the people's will," Feng said in a statement.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court hears case that could determine the future of voting in the US | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court will take on the future of federal elections Wednesday, discussing a case that could upend electoral politics and embolden state legislatures to act without judicial oversight. Today may be the day where the next Senate will have no choice but to expand the SCOTUS to 13 seats. i noticed some thing slight but strange, cnn always said trumps claim was false about the election being rigged, now they used the word baseless claim. subtle but found it strange. Let’s see how well they do or don’t. We need to pay attention.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Congressional District MapsThe Supreme Court considers whether the Constitution renders state courts powerless to remedy gerrymandered maps drawn by state legislatures Fairly misleading headline. This would rule on whether state courts can intervene if they have no power to do so in that state's constitution. Nope, but it does render them powerless for unconstitutional firearms laws, so it's time to go after gun control committees Nation wide.🇺🇸 Drawing congressional districts is a state legislative power as stated in the constitution. Black letter law. Lawyers are trying to find a way around that.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case pitting free speech against LGBTQ rightsWhen the Supreme Court convenes for oral arguments Monday, it will be confronted with an issue it has been asked to resolve before in court fights involving bakers, a florist, and now, a web designer. Will see if the Supreme Court loses even more respectability, this should be a simple case, The State her company is registered in has a public accommodation law, but nothing is simple when the US version of the Morality Police is involved These elitist companies must have significant profits if they can pick and choose who they work for. It's not about rights. It's about an agenda.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case that could undercut LGBTQ rightsThe Supreme Court will hear arguments today in a case that could undercut LGBTQ rights. The high court will consider whether a Colorado-based web designer is obligated under her state’s laws to design websites for weddings of same-sex couples. How many web designers do you think are in Colorado? Why are you harassing this person when you can just go to other companies 'Case that could undercut LGBTQ rights' Is this an editorial? The editor that approved this is clearly biased. I’d rather hire someone who believes I have a right to exist rather than force someone who hates me. Just saying.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court hears clash between LGBTQ and business owners' rightsThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a potential landmark case on LGBTQ rights. The case involves a web designer who claims Colorado law prevents her from designing wedding websites because she thinks marriage should only be between a man and a woman I wish her good luck! 'Design your own website.' so the opposite side of all the cases that keep being brought against the baker in CO.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case of Colorado wedding website refusing gay marriage workThe Supreme Court is eyeing Colorado's law barring businesses from discriminating against gay, lesbian or transgender people in a free-speech challenge. I should start a gay marriage website. Pretty sure straight people would not come after me. You can't mandate people to work for you.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »