Supreme Court Weighs ‘Most Important Case’ on Democracy

  • 📰 wttw
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 65 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections.

“This is the single most important case on American democracy — and for American democracy — in the nation’s history,” said former federal judge Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative who has joined the legal team defending the North Carolina court decision.

If the court were to recognize it now, opponents of the concept argue, the effects could be much broader than just redistricting. “Unfortunately, because of ongoing and widespread efforts to sow distrust and spread disinformation, confidence in our elections is at a low ebb," Ginsberg wrote in a Supreme Court filing. “The version of the independent state legislature theory advanced by Petitioners in this case threatens to make a bad situation much worse, exacerbating the current moment of political polarization and further undermining confidence in our elections.

“We’ve seen a fairly pervasive attempt to use courts to rewrite election laws if those laws don’t suit partisan agendas,” Snead said in a call with reporters. “That’s not something we want to see when it flies in the face of the Constitution.” During the last redistricting cycle, states that used independent redistricting commissions rather than legislatures were largely Democratic-dominated ones. Commissions drew 95 House seats in states with Democratic legislatures and governors, as opposed to only 12 in states with GOP control. A ruling that grants legislatures ultimate power over redistricting could eradicate those commissions and let Democrats redraw a major chunk of the House map.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Federal Government should set the election guidelines so it would be consistent across the country. State Rights should never come in to play. Why is voting and the electoral process even an issue in 2022? Because that's the way the powers that be want it.

The states should control elections. Federal government should not run elections. Too many crooks.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 520. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracy, focused on power of state legislatures | amNewYorkThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: amNewYork - 🏆 336. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs increasing state lawmakers’ power during electionsThe court is set to hear arguments where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court. State legislators already have plenary power over election laws and the electoral college. This is delighted to them in the US Constitution. You mean they weigh ending democracy. Who will be making the arguments? Lawyers and AGs funded by Leonard Leo. Who will be ruling? 6 Justices hand picked by Leonard Leo. Sure they do. Because the SC is illegitimate. Bought and paid for by Conservatives.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs case on state legislatures' power over federal electionsThe Supreme Court is about to confront an elections case that could dramatically alter voting and significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency. It’s where the power was always intended to be: with the states. Dems just want more central control and a huge federal government. really doesn't get it do they? It should be the power of the states the whole time. Who is running their twitter? At least read the Constitution first 😂 The Constitution gives state lawmakers full power over elections. This should come as no surprise as the federal government was created by states when they ratified the constitution. States wouldn't have signed on to federal intervention in state elections.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracyA Republican-led challenge is asking the Supreme Court for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs 'most important case' on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case that could dramatically alter voting in 2024 and beyond. Corrupt court.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case that could dramatically alter voting in 2024 and beyond. A Republican-led challenge is asking the justices for a novel ruling that could …
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »