LGBTQ Protections at Center of Supreme Court Case Pitting Free Speech Against Gay Marriage

  • 📰 NBCDFW
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 58 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The case comes at a time when the court is dominated 6-3 by conservatives and following a series of cases in which the justices have sided with religious plaintiffs.

Five years ago, the Supreme Court heard a different challenge involving Colorado's law and a baker, Jack Phillips, who objected to designing a wedding cake for a gay couple. That case ended with a limited decision, however, and set up a return of the issue to the high court. Phillips' lawyer, Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom, is now representing Smith.

Like Phillips, Smith says her objection is not to working with gay people. She says she'd work with a gay client who needed help with graphics for an animal rescue shelter, for example, or to promote an organization serving children with disabilities. But she objects to creating messages supporting same-sex marriage, she says, just as she won't take jobs that would require her to create content promoting atheism or gambling or supporting abortion.

Smith says Colorado’s law violates her free speech rights. Her opponents, including the Biden administration and groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, disagree. Twenty mostly liberal states, including California and New York, are supporting Colorado while another 20 mostly Republican states, including Arizona, Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee, are supporting Smith.A survey by the Trevor Project found that 2/3 of LGBTQ youth say current and proposed state policies have had a negative impact on their mental health. As the school year starts back for many students this month, LGBTQ students, face many challenges.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Why is it a crime to reject something that stands against your beliefs But it is okay to be forced to do something against your beliefs as long as it fits the other sides narrative F'ed up!

The business owner should be able to act as their religious beliefs allows. Stop discriminating against people based on their religion.

LGBTQ please VOTE LGB gay VoteBlue the supreme court is coming for your rights. SupremeCourt RightToProtest

Imagine if someone went into a black-owned business and requested a George Floyd is a Criminal cake.

LGBTQ may have the people in place to win some of their battles here on earth but they will not win them in Heaven unless they repent and accept Jesus as their Savior

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 288. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Same-sex marriage and LGBTQ protections at center of another Supreme Court caseA Colorado business owner who opposes same-sex marriage sued the state because she would like to accept customers planning opposite-sex weddings but reject requests made by same-sex couples. Her case has reached the Supreme Court. The part I don’t understand is NO ONE has approached her to do so. She’s just wanting to cause a scene and create drama. Private business so just like vax mandates, none of anyone’s business what she does. Good for her 👍🏽. Why would gays even want to go to her? It’s a win/win
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court To Hear Case on Whether Website Designer Can Refuse Service to LGBTQ Customers“Colorado is censoring and compelling my speech and really forcing me to pour my creativity into creating messages that violate my convictions,” the web designer said.
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court again confronts case pitting free speech against LGBTQ rightsThe court is hearing oral arguments in the case from Lorie Smith five years after hearing the case brought by Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding. Groomers don’t get to override our constitution. Your perversion doesn't trump the Constitution You have the right to be LGBTQXYZ. Others have the right to disagree and not want their children learning about your views in our education system. Convo complete.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court hears clash between LGBTQ and business owners' rightsThe case involves a Colorado web designer who says state law prevents her from designing wedding website because she believes that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »