Supreme Court hears case pitting free speech against LGBTQ rights

  • 📰 CBSNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 73 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

When the Supreme Court convenes for oral arguments Monday, it will be confronted with an issue it has been asked to resolve before in court fights involving bakers, a florist, and now, a web designer.

before her, is a Christian business owner who says her religious beliefs prevent her from creating custom websites for a same-sex wedding. But her refusal could violate Colorado's public accommodation law, which prohibits businesses open to the public from refusing service because of sexual orientation and announcing their intent to do so.

Smith's case, known as 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, could now be the vehicle for addressing that issue. "What's unfortunate is that what I'm asking the court to protect is the right for all to speak freely," Smith said."This not only protects me, it protects the LGBT web designer who shouldn't be forced to communicate messages that go against their deeply held beliefs, and the right to speak freely is guaranteed to all of us."

Smith appealed to the Supreme Court in September 2021, asking the justices to decide whether applying an anti-discrimination law like Colorado's to compel an artist to speak, contrary to their religious beliefs, violates the free speech or free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. Waggoner, who also argued Phillips' case five years ago, noted that public accommodation laws and the First Amendment have"coexisted for many years," with the rights of speakers have been protected. supporting Smith, telling the court that their interpretation of public accommodation laws demonstrates how to strike a balance between protecting artists' speech by allowing message-based objections and preventing discrimination in the marketplace.

The Biden administration is backing Colorado in the dispute and told the Supreme Court that the First Amendment does not entitle Smith to a categorical exemption from a law protecting from discrimination.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Freedom of words? Freedom of writing words.

Bottom line is does the Constitution support religious freedom. No one whether Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim should have to do anything against their own personal spiritual belief.

Forcing gay on straight people, have to endure gay pride month so why should those who don't support it lose their free speech

I would say it's more nondiscrimination rights or basic services rights than specifically LGBTQ right

We must preserve the rights of the small business owner to refuse service.

I’m not a billionaire not paying taxes, l’m single 73 making less than 45000 and paying more in taxes than billionaires because I can’t afford to buy a politician even a small one! Corruption is rampant everywhere in government! Wake Up Americans do ANYTHING for a better life!

What about the SUPER IMPORTANT that affects almost all Americans! The rich not paying fair share of taxes, buying politicians to serve themselves, raising prices GREED, not paying workers a living wage! Are we slaves? WAKE Up Americans!

This should NOT say LGBTQ rights. It should say American citizen rights.

No one should be forced to do what they don’t believe in that’s like asking Biden to secure the border you can ask but he doesn’t have to

Nice to See CBS is Still On Twitter, doing what THEY do Best.. L......Y.......I......N....G....

All Americans have the same rights… The left just despises free speech.

Scotus should send back to state and stop taking these frivolous suits from conservative PACs! This is a “What if” case! What if someone wants me to do this, no one has asked but what if they do! From old liberal, if you tell me you don’t want to do it, I find someone who will!

They seem to spend an inordinate amount of time finding cases that take justice, fairness, rights away from people to support.

And the baker won, the florist won, and the web developer will win. LGBTQ attacks on Christians are nasty.

It's not about rights. It's about an agenda.

These elitist companies must have significant profits if they can pick and choose who they work for.

Will see if the Supreme Court loses even more respectability, this should be a simple case, The State her company is registered in has a public accommodation law, but nothing is simple when the US version of the Morality Police is involved

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 87. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court hears clash between LGBTQ and business owners' rightsThe case involves a Colorado web designer who says state law prevents her from designing wedding website because she believes that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »

LGBTQ Protections at Center of Supreme Court Case Pitting Free Speech Against Gay MarriageThe case comes at a time when the court is dominated 6-3 by conservatives and following a series of cases in which the justices have sided with religious plaintiffs. LGBTQ may have the people in place to win some of their battles here on earth but they will not win them in Heaven unless they repent and accept Jesus as their Savior Imagine if someone went into a black-owned business and requested a George Floyd is a Criminal cake. LGBTQ please VOTE LGB gay VoteBlue the supreme court is coming for your rights. SupremeCourt RightToProtest
Source: NBCDFW - 🏆 288. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court To Hear Case on Whether Website Designer Can Refuse Service to LGBTQ Customers“Colorado is censoring and compelling my speech and really forcing me to pour my creativity into creating messages that violate my convictions,” the web designer said.
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court again confronts case pitting free speech against LGBTQ rightsThe court is hearing oral arguments in the case from Lorie Smith five years after hearing the case brought by Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding. Groomers don’t get to override our constitution. Your perversion doesn't trump the Constitution You have the right to be LGBTQXYZ. Others have the right to disagree and not want their children learning about your views in our education system. Convo complete.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Same-sex marriage and LGBTQ protections at center of another Supreme Court caseA Colorado business owner who opposes same-sex marriage sued the state because she would like to accept customers planning opposite-sex weddings but reject requests made by same-sex couples. Her case has reached the Supreme Court. The part I don’t understand is NO ONE has approached her to do so. She’s just wanting to cause a scene and create drama. Private business so just like vax mandates, none of anyone’s business what she does. Good for her 👍🏽. Why would gays even want to go to her? It’s a win/win
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court hears gay marriage opponent's challenge to anti-discrimination lawThe Supreme Court will hear the appeal of a Colorado wedding website designer who says the state violates her free speech by requiring her to serve LGBTQ couples. Only western countries have such weird problem. If someone doesn't agree with something, all you have to do is NOT be a jerk about it. Look the other way, refer those people to another business, etc. It’s a sin
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »