Stuart Anderson:Local police officers in Kansas stopped three individuals, at different times, for ordinary traffic offenses. The officers came to suspect that the individuals lacked lawful immigration status. Officers began to investigate their immigration and employment status.
The Kansas State Supreme Court – in agreement with the Iowa Supreme Court – held that this sort of criminal prosecution is barred by federal law. No state supreme courts have ever allowed such a prosecution theory to proceed.a that could affect businesses?Federal law determines the categories of immigrants who are authorized to work – and, conversely, those who are not.
They need to change their slogan HEAD FOR THE BOARDER! Because we really have a problem now....stop the invasion on our boarders.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Immigration Case Could Be Bad For BusinessA new Supreme Court case may empower politically ambitious prosecutors to go after restaurants and other businesses on immigration grounds. Taco Bell? Racist
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court stumped by the case of the unconscious drunken driverU.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday wrestled with whether police need a court... Nice chemtrails Wow, with how intoxiced he was, the 90 or so minutes getting a warrant wouldnt have mattered.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court Sides With Business in Arbitration CaseThe Supreme Court put tighter limits on classwide arbitration, making it easier for businesses to avoid claims by groups of employees or consumers. thanks, assholes. Thanks to Donald J. Trump. GOP looking out for the working class.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Opinion | Should Noncitizens Be Represented in Congress?Opinion: The law and facts overwhelmingly support the Trump administration’s appeal: It should be able to include a citizenship question in the 2020 census, write DavidRivkin and Richard Raile They should be able to include that question That would include the entire global population then, wouldn't it? This article is lucky to not be on paper. I would either burn it or wipe my but with it. Depending on if it’s cold or I need to 💩.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump’s Census Citizenship QuestionIn an 80-minute argument Tuesday that was both technical and combative, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh directed almost all their questions to the lawyers challenging the decision to ask about citizenship. Kavanaugh said Congress gave the Commerce secretary 'huge discretion Of course they do..... GRRRRRREEEEEEEEEAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTT! You think immigrants are afraid to come out now. Besides I don’t need to prove no citizenship. My word should be good enough.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Florida Supreme Court rules against Parkland sheriffMIAMI (AP) — The Florida Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled against a sheriff who fought his removal from office after the governor claimed he failed to prevent last year's Parkland school shooting. Good. Fuck this dude and his 'amazing leadership' Yahoo is heartbroken over this....🤣👍
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Trump lawyer, Supreme Court justices clash over citizenship question on 2020 censusPres. Trump's top administration lawyer clashes with liberal justices of the Supreme Court over the administration's plan to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census: 'The conservative majority seemed untroubled by the addition of the question'. Game over fellas, Trump wins. I think enough US citizens should refuse to participate with this sham of a Census if the Supreme Court allows Trump and Ross to have this senseless question added; which only serves to discourage undocumented people from being included, as constitutionally mandated. No. Trump refused a LEGAL order by forcing Treasury to withhold.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court conservatives appear ready to OK Trump’s census citizenship questionDebates over the census are usually reserved for demographers and statisticians, but the dispute over the citizenship question is one of high politics. More like “Supreme Leader’s Court weighs his push to add his citizenship question to census” We could all say yes we are citizens or we could all say we are not citizens .i prefer the former. mijomojo1 I tawt I taw a puddytat. I did. I did tee a puddytat!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court hears dispute over Trump census citizenship questionLower courts have blocked the question, ruling that the administration violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution in seeking to include it on the census form. The nine Supreme Court justices will hold an extended 80-minute argument session in the administration's appeal, with a ruling due by They aren't scared enough to not steal identities (70% do). Why would they be afraid to lie? Well, at least hopefully it does. The spin on this is ridiculous. Citizens vote!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »