WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court put tighter limits on classwide arbitration Wednesday, making it easier for businesses to avoid claims by groups of employees or consumers.
Workers and consumers bound by arbitration clauses automatically waive the right to pursue classwide claims unless their contracts specifically provide for such proceedings, the court held, dividing 5-4 along its conservative-liberal line.
Is anyone surprised the Republican hacks of Scotus favored commercial interests over the individual? The corps pay the arbitrators which is why individuals lose most of the time. SCOTUS worries about their convenience, not your constitutional right to petition the courts. Sham
Bullshit for the big wigs and corporations
The Supreme Court put lighter limits on wide mass arbitrary victimization, thus making it easier for businesses to avoid responsibility by ignoring vast groups of it's victims...be they employees or consumers. Because corporations are people, my friends.
I’d rather have the ability to find a new job than sue my employer.
Well, that’s a shocker
Politics sure works well when we are dealing with “ justice “ for the little guy. Sad
America loses again.
Because a single individual has the same resources as a multi-billion dollar corporation.
Hey/if you think it’s alright for an employee to freeze to death this is nothing
There’s a shocker.
GOP looking out for the working class.
thanks, assholes.
Thanks to Donald J. Trump.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court stumped by the case of the unconscious drunken driverU.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday wrestled with whether police need a court... Nice chemtrails Wow, with how intoxiced he was, the 90 or so minutes getting a warrant wouldnt have mattered.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Divided Supreme Court sides with business owners over workers in class arbitration rulingChief justice’s 13-page opinion prompts 31 pages of dissent from the court’s liberals. No surprise there. We've become the United Corporations of America. American supreme court ? Where judges have political agendas and inclinations !! Keep casting those protest votes and imposing those purity tests. You see how well they’re working for you.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court could limit access to business dataFreedom of Information Act cases remain a relative rarity at the Supreme Court — Monday’s arguments are the first FOIA-focused ones at the court in more than eight years. They are afraid Kavanaugh's beer consumption will be able to be extrapolated from business data.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court to decide fate of citizenship question on 2020 censusSupreme Court to decide fate of citizenship question on 2020 census. Until 1950, the census regularly asked about citizenship status, a practice discontinued 70 years ago over concerns it harmed participation. Government intelligence going backwards, whats next removing womens right to vote? Reinstating slavery? I vote northern states become part of Canada...
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court poised to give Trump victory on census citizenship questionConservative U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared sympathetic during opening arguments toward a bid by the Trump administration to add a citizenship query on the 2020 census via ReutersTV if there's no citizenship question we will boycottCensus2020 Census2020 No citizenship question no Census Interesting you bring up Trump trying to ask people whether they're citizens or not and not, say, Obama locking kids in cages, providing weapons to Mexican cartels on the border or deporting more people than any other president... Obama is full of it. He's just creating conflict where he could have fixed the problem. Typical crap and blame someone else
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court takes up cases that could settle whether LGBT workers are protected by lawThe cases come as federal courts as well as independent agencies within the Trump administration remain divided over whether the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. If this passes employers won't hire LBGTQ people to begin with because it would be impossible to fire them. when u get fired play the gender card! its like the race card and rape card!
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Trump on track for Supreme Court victory on census citizenship questionSupreme Court conservatives appear sympathetic toward Trump's census citizenship query via ReutersTV TV Come Here Legally.. Its That Simply TV Why can you ask people to identify gender and race but not citizenship status? SCOTUSblog Census2020 TV 🤦♂️
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court girds for fight over Trump census citizenship questionSitting on a working-class commercial strip in the shadows of an above-ground rail line, a group called Make the Road New York's busy street-level offices are easy to miss. A sign on its front door in a heavily Hispanic neighborhood of the borough of Queens warns law enforcement officers not to Round up illegals For those who think that those who can vote should be counted, why were slaves counted through 1860?
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court agrees to take on workplace LGBT discrimination casesUS Supreme Court says it will decide whether existing civil rights laws ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, a question that has divided the nation's lower courts. - PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC Unfortunately, not optimistic. The Court will interpret from a 1960s perspective. PeteWilliamsNBC Well we know how the drunk will vote!
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »