Supreme Court to decide if giant cross is religious symbol or secular memorial to war dead

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 86%

Law Law Headlines News

The case raises a question that has vexed the justices for decades: What is the proper place for religion in American public life?

, a Washington, D.C. suburb. On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will be asked to decide whether it stays, raising a question that has vexed the justices for decades: What is the proper place for religion in American public life?

In 2012, the American Humanist Association filed a lawsuit, claiming that its presence on public land violates the Constitution, amounting to a government establishment of religion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia agreed, saying it could not ignore that"for thousands of years the Latin cross has represented Christianity."

"The Latin cross is not embraced by non-Christians or used by them as a symbol of death or sacrifice," she says. When the government prominently displays the cross as a war memorial,"it does more than just align the state with Christianity. It also callously discriminates against patriotic soldiers who are not Christian."

The American Legion also urges the court to abandon a test it has used for decades to determine whether government displays or expressions involving religious symbols would be seen by a reasonable person as a government endorsement of a particular religious faith.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The cross isn’t religious life. It’s the Truth of a personal relationship with the Lord who shed his blood and life to save us as sinners. It once was America’s heritage. The Bible and prayer was part of the sessions in congress. Then the liberals crept in.

In church !

Today. . . it needs to pay taxes to play in politics.

Your religion should be like your sex life: private.

it is not an 'endorsement'...... it is an 'acknowledgment'. over 70% of American pop identify as christian.

The proper place is places of worship or Cemetery. That’s pretty much it.

It should be private and up to each individual. Why does it have to be in the public? It becomes public when it becomes a business.

Pew Research Center has an excellent piece on religious courts now operating in America. 'Applying God’s Law: Religious Courts and Mediation in the U.S.'

The right place for it is anywhere but Inside-Government!

Next, 'In God We Trust, ' then Bibles for swearing in offices, then ban all churches... until we are made to worship government, global warming scientists only, and MSM.

No place is the right place for religion.

Keep your religion to yourself. It has no place in government.

I’ll make it simple. IF YOU CAN NOT SHOW EVIDENCE THAT ITS TRUE YOU CANT MAKE LAWS SUPPORTED BY IT. Thank you. We wouldn’t pass a healthcare bill based on what Harry Potter would have wanted. End of story.

ragstorm A Supreme Court that doesn't understand that the USA was founded on religious freedom & that there is **NO** 'separation of church & state' in the Constitution does NOT deserve to sit on the bench & needs disbarred immediately.

CONGRESS shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Separate.

Leave it alone, it was decided by others to have it. Drive by knuckle heads trying to decide for others don’t get a voice when they are not part!!! Stop the dumbass nonsense!

NO PLACE!

Think for a second what is more of a danger to humanity gangster rap that exploits and degrades woman or a cross that symbolizes peace love and hope. The cross has nothing to do with the guilty of how we live but thug music influences the young in a negative way

American civilian childless population vs American military population. Decrease and you increase? Game

Religion should be a big part of American public life. Religion doesn't profess a particular political party but a way of life. Prayer is a way to ask for guidance and forgiveness. It doesn't put one person above another. Religion teaches us right from wrong.

I say keep the cross and everyone should be tolerant of other religions.

The proper place for the Christian and Jewish religion is everywhere in public life. We are all of God and God is in all of us.

I’ve no problem with secular memorials, but otherwise it does not belong in politics or publicly (taxpayer) funded institutions. Only in your homes, churches, synagogues, temples and mosques.

Separation between Church and State as it has been.

Discuss the movie is rather strange as if it has an earth which should know where and not grow in term of the confidence voiced of it seems accompaciment to the relationship who believes

The only people who have a right to decide the memorial are the families whose loved ones are being remembered.

Religion has shown itself to be full of corruption, full of lies and full of duplicity. Religion has no place in our world.

That is a WWI memorial. Anyone that wants to destroy those memorials has a true hatred for those who served.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court to decide fate of cross-shaped WWI memorial in MarylandThe Supreme Court hears arguments on whether a 40-foot Bladensburg, Maryland, cross-shaped war memorial violates the First Amendment. Should it be taken down? Emotionally I would leave the cross, legally it should be moved. Were any of the 49 soldiers members of any other religion? If not, then the answer is it does not entangle itself in religion. who is offended by this one?
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

War memorial or religious symbol? Cross fight reaches U.S. high courtWhen Fred Edwords first drove by the 40-foot-tall (12 meters) concrete cross tha... Subscribe to pewdiepie Erase history... Religious symbol. Duh. Next question?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

War over 'Peace Cross' puts Supreme Court in crosshairs of debate over government involvement with religionThe Supreme Court will be on trial itself this month when it considers the fate of a 40-foot Latin cross honoring World War I dead. I feel no sympathy for anyone offended by the Peace Cross or any other religious expression. The Establishment Clause forbids a Church of America vis-à-vis the Church of England or Ireland, but not religious symbols. All religions are cults... some just have more followers than others Put a baphomet right next to it
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court to decide if Clean Water Act limits Hawaii’s underground wastewater dumpingThe Supreme Court has agreed to hear an important case on the Clean Water Act and decide whether environmentalists can sue to block Hawaii’s disposal of wastewater that flows underground into the Pacific Ocean. Nuclear contamination by coolant systems at San Ononfre an in all naval ships. Perhaps evident by phosphoresencent red tide when ships come in to dock at NASCO & toxic la jolla. Hemet, CA has high nitrates a class action could possibly get the city to pay for new water heaters This issue is real. I know HI marine biologists who were part of Nx markers studies that traced the injection well flow that caused harm to reefs. Old Colonial oligarchy thrives in HI. This is really getting to the crux of the matter.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Has the Supreme Court Already Decided the Wall Case?Analysis: Another recent case mirrors the litigation challenges to the wall — and Trump won it trump will win this... and there is nothing you can do about it.. he just won 2020 Never seen a human with an asshole shaped mouth oh wait what am I talking about of course it's Donald Trump
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

The Supreme Court curtails states’ power to seize propertyThe unanimous decision is being cheered by advocates on the left and right *UNANIMOUSLY*!!
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »

Opinion | It'll take more than a Supreme Court case to end police abuse of property rightsOpinion | Scott Lemieux: Police abused civil forfeiture laws for so long that the Supreme Court stepped in. But one ruling won't end it. - NBCNewsTHINK
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court bolsters the right of owners to fight police seizures of propertyThe Supreme Court on Wednesday strengthened the rights of Americans to fight police seizures of vehicles and other property, ruling the 8th Amendment’s ban on “excessive fines” applies to states and localities, not just the federal government. Finally the government does something right Good
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Opinion | The Supreme Court has a chance to clear up decades of confusionThe justices have the chance to undo past confusion over Bladensburg’s Peace Cross with their ruling. The injustice of PAYING PEOPLE TO SOW DIVISION IN OUR COUNTRY! Watch! Mmmmm Why did the chicken cross the road?
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »