Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts Says Justices Shouldn’t ‘Live in Fear’

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Chief Justice John Roberts closed a tumultuous year for the Supreme Court with an annual report that recalled the violent resistance the judiciary faced when it aggressively dismantled state-enforced racial segregation in the 1950s and ‘60s.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal , a co-sponsor of the judicial-security bill that the chief justice cited, called the report “a huge missed opportunity.”

The chief justice “could have said, ‘We need to face facts, we need to face our own challenges,’” Mr. Blumenthal said, adding, “I think there will be a move again for legislation to require more financial disclosure” and other ethics measures. “Judicial opinions speak for themselves, and there is no obligation in our free country to agree with them,” the chief justice wrote in his year-end report. “Indeed, we judges frequently dissent—sometimes strongly—from our colleagues’ opinions, and we explain why” in court opinions.

“In an organized society, there can be nothing but ultimate confusion and chaos if court decrees” are flouted, the report quotes Judge Davies saying. Chief Justice Roberts added that the courthouse bench where Judge Davies presided—and where civil-rights attorney Thurgood Marshall, later a justice, argued—would be placed on display at the Supreme Court.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The Supreme Court should be about Law + Order. They know the identity of the leaker who broke the law which makes him a criminal, and they have decided to protect the criminal! WTF!

Who leaked

And neither should American women live in fear.

Yeah, neither should the American people. He can get on with his last year's for all I care. I only hope Trump and McConnell are there to piss on his grave since he couldn't get enough of them.

The Supreme Court job is to interpret the constitution and its original intent, not fulfill a Political party’s desire and false promise for power , control and votes of its citizens.

So reveal the liberal leaker Roberts! You need to step aside if you cannot handle it. Let's have the loser!!! If it were a conservative, it would have been leaked by now. I want jail time for Him or Her.

Welcome to the real world... Make sure you and the other justices move into a gated community with valid security...

Eh, lifetime terms with no repurcussions for your actions Get real Roberts.

TERM LIMITS FOR US SUPREME COURT!!!!!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Chief justice: Judges' safety 'essential' to court systemWASHINGTON (AP) — With security threats to Supreme Court justices still fresh memories, Chief Justice John Roberts on Saturday praised programs that protect judges, saying that “we must support judges by ensuring their safety.” They should live no differently than the rest of us. They're not nobles. Yes, now he has another notch in his belt He owns the fact that the Supreme Court has fallen to corruption on his watch so talk to me he has become a failure in history books, and in reality, where to go, Roberts They could also try to not be so worthy of such threats with their awful extremist activism
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Court Watch with Alex Swoyer: Supreme Court takes on major First Amendment, LGBTQ battleThe Supreme Court heard a major battle between First Amendment rights and LGBTQ protections this month. Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the case fighting for her free speech rights, and her attorney Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom joined Alex Swoyer to comment on the oral arguments. Mike Davis, a former clerk to Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, also joined the episode to break down other major legal topics facing the justices this term, including the ongoing probe into who leaked the draft opinion earlier this year revealing the justices would overturn Roe v. Wade. 
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Year in Review: Five most consequential Supreme Court decisions of 2022The Supreme Court flexed its conservative muscle with several blockbuster decisions following its fall 2021-2022 term that had an immediate impact on state laws in 2022 — and will shape legal precedent for years to come. What do the judges think about the Biden MacBook 💻? Perhaps the most consequential decision the US Supreme Court could take. Are bank capital requirements with decreed risk weights: 0% Federal Government - 100% We the People, in accordance with the Constitution? Seemingly it does not want to hear the case.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

EPA finalizes contentious water rule despite pending case at U.S. Supreme CourtThe Biden administration on Friday finalized a rule protecting waterways that feed into rivers and lakes under the Clean Water Act, addressing a contentious question the U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing and restoring previous protections the Trump administration removed. Actually heard a great catch up with Mr Mrart3rs , I like his analysis of Crypto and Bitcoin, also his confidence in the Crypto space. I earn $20K in the next few weeks however is too high but just imagine it was correct. You can follow him for bitcoin earning tips😱 Ranchers and Farmers beware, they're coming for your livelihood again...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Questions Raised About Charity Tied to Supreme CourtA report in 'The New York Times' is raising questions about a charity tied to the U.S. Supreme Court that has raked in millions—a significant chunk of it from entities with matters before the justices. The Supreme Court is as corruptive as the trump administration. How much does a favorable ruling cost?
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »

Hundreds convicted by non-unanimous juries have right to new trial, Oregon Supreme Court rulesHundreds of defendants in Oregon who were convicted of crimes by non-unanimous juries before the U.S. Supreme Court struck down such jury verdicts have a right to a new trial, under a decision issued by the state's supreme court on Friday.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »