in October hearing Sackett v. EPA, a case that asks what test courts should use to ascertain what constitutes "waters of the United States," and thereby regulated by the Clean Water Act. Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Charles Yates, who represents plaintiffs who were told they needed to obtain a CWA permit to build a home on wetlands, said the case "provides the Supreme Court an important opportunity to clarify and decisively end this continuous game of regulatory ping-pong.
But attorney Stu Gillespie of Earthjustice, an environmental law firm that challenged the Trump-era rules in court, said the Biden administration’s rule is based on a robust scientific record, showing that federal agencies and not the courts should be in charge of these policies. “I think this kind of highlights the perils of an activist court, reaching out and getting in front of their own skis,” Gillespie said of the regulatory process behind the Friday rule.
The rule is certain to be challenged in court immediately, said Robin Craig, a professor at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, but added that "an adverse decision from the Supreme Court in Sackett could gut the new rule entirely." EPA administrator Michael Regan said the new rule would be "durable" and provide "greater certainty for farmers, ranchers and landowners.
Ranchers and Farmers beware, they're coming for your livelihood again...
Actually heard a great catch up with Mr Mrart3rs , I like his analysis of Crypto and Bitcoin, also his confidence in the Crypto space. I earn $20K in the next few weeks however is too high but just imagine it was correct. You can follow him for bitcoin earning tips😱
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Court Watch with Alex Swoyer: Supreme Court takes on major First Amendment, LGBTQ battleThe Supreme Court heard a major battle between First Amendment rights and LGBTQ protections this month. Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the case fighting for her free speech rights, and her attorney Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom joined Alex Swoyer to comment on the oral arguments. Mike Davis, a former clerk to Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, also joined the episode to break down other major legal topics facing the justices this term, including the ongoing probe into who leaked the draft opinion earlier this year revealing the justices would overturn Roe v. Wade.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Year in Review: Five most consequential Supreme Court decisions of 2022The Supreme Court flexed its conservative muscle with several blockbuster decisions following its fall 2021-2022 term that had an immediate impact on state laws in 2022 — and will shape legal precedent for years to come. What do the judges think about the Biden MacBook 💻? Perhaps the most consequential decision the US Supreme Court could take. Are bank capital requirements with decreed risk weights: 0% Federal Government - 100% We the People, in accordance with the Constitution? Seemingly it does not want to hear the case.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court Allows Title 42 to Stay in PlaceSTORY OF THE WEEK: The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Title 42 public health policy can remain in effect, allowing Border Patrol to continue quickly deporting unauthorized migrants. Doesn't this not actually mean anything?
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »
Jeff Ross Comedy Central Roast Will Be A Key In Supreme Court Hearing On Death SentenceA Texas man facing the death penalty claims a Comedy Central roast conducted during his imprisonment unfairly influenced his sentencing. Convicted murderer Gabriel Hall is shown making light of his…
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
US Supreme Court keeps asylum limits in place for nowThe Supreme Court is keeping pandemic-era limits on asylum in place for now, dashing hopes of migrants who have been fleeing violence and inequality in Latin America and elsewhere to reach the United States. The case will be argued in February and a stay imposed last week by Chief Justice John Roberts will remain in place until the justices make a decision. The limits, often known as Title 42 in reference to a 1944 public health law, were put in place under then-President Donald Trump at the beginning of the pandemic, but unwinding it has taken a torturous route through the courts. Why haven't there been any news reported about the so called violence the suppose to be happening in Latin American? What is really going on? You just violated rules number one and three. You lose your coffee privileges.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
A Mexican Supreme Court justice fights a plagiarism scandalA faculty member at Yasmín Esquivel Mossa's alma mater has accused her of plagiarizing her 1987 undergraduate thesis. The scandal has ensnared two of Mexico’s most prestigious public institutions and laid bare the country’s polarized political climate. 🤣🤣🤣 I’m paralyzed and I’m trying to raise money to help me get treatments to help me walk again. Can you help please share and donate to help give me a chance please. Anything will help please
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »