Hundreds convicted by non-unanimous juries have right to new trial, Oregon Supreme Court rules

  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Hundreds of defendants in Oregon who were convicted of crimes by non-unanimous juries before the U.S. Supreme Court struck down such jury verdicts have a right to a new trial, under a decision issued by the state's supreme court on Friday.

Convictions dating back decades could be overturned, state justice department officials said, although the statute of limitations might bar relief for some older convictions.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 235. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Court Watch with Alex Swoyer: Supreme Court takes on major First Amendment, LGBTQ battleThe Supreme Court heard a major battle between First Amendment rights and LGBTQ protections this month. Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the case fighting for her free speech rights, and her attorney Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom joined Alex Swoyer to comment on the oral arguments. Mike Davis, a former clerk to Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, also joined the episode to break down other major legal topics facing the justices this term, including the ongoing probe into who leaked the draft opinion earlier this year revealing the justices would overturn Roe v. Wade. 
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

EPA finalizes contentious water rule despite pending case at U.S. Supreme CourtThe Biden administration on Friday finalized a rule protecting waterways that feed into rivers and lakes under the Clean Water Act, addressing a contentious question the U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing and restoring previous protections the Trump administration removed. Actually heard a great catch up with Mr Mrart3rs , I like his analysis of Crypto and Bitcoin, also his confidence in the Crypto space. I earn $20K in the next few weeks however is too high but just imagine it was correct. You can follow him for bitcoin earning tips😱 Ranchers and Farmers beware, they're coming for your livelihood again...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Questions Raised About Charity Tied to Supreme CourtA report in 'The New York Times' is raising questions about a charity tied to the U.S. Supreme Court that has raked in millions—a significant chunk of it from entities with matters before the justices. The Supreme Court is as corruptive as the trump administration. How much does a favorable ruling cost?
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court asked to stop judges from giving out punishment for acquitted offensesThough the practice has provoked some concern, sentencing a defendant for what’s called “acquitted conduct” has gone on for years.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »

Advocates criticize U.S. Supreme Court decision on Title 42The Supreme Court’s decision on Title42 received universal condemnation by organizations who work directly with migrants. One advocate said the decision 'will have deadly consequences for people fleeing persecution.' Even Neil Gorsuch, highly conservative SCOTUS judge, condemned the move as being more political than judicial. Title 42 was for Covid Emergency, so keeping it when the threat is over makes no sense. It's a political issue that needs to be address by Reps and Dems.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »