Chief justice: Judges' safety 'essential' to court system

and Sonia Sotomayor, have said the court needs to be concerned about overturning precedent and appearing political.for the justices and their families. Separately, in December, lawmakers passed legislation protecting the personal information of federal judges including their addresses.

In writing about judicial security, Roberts told the story of Judge Ronald N. Davies, who in September 1957 ordered the integration of Little Rock Central High School in Arkansas. Davies’ decision followed the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education ruling that segregated schools were unconstitutional and rejected Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus’ attempt to stop school integration.Davies “was physically threatened for following the law,” but the judge was “uncowed,” Roberts said.

If these Supreme court judges keep trying to turn back the hands of time and keep taking away our rights....they will have to continue to live scared...that's what happens when you piss off millions of women simultaneously...

Specifically From what?

Government officials shouldn't need to be protected if they are listening to the will of the people

corruptedMedia

And where is the program to protect citizens against guns.

Why are the American People angered more at this time in history 😐

Champion a program to bring respect back to it!

The guy who made Bribery legal. Traitor.

One of the clearest signs of oligarchy is that some people’s safety is more important than others.

Fine, but I think they have a bigger issue to deal with. Their legitimacy is more what’s at steak.

Maybe they should stop playing god with women's rights.

If liberals would stop threatening to assassinate justices, that’d be great.

What about the Peoples security from biased self serving ideological justices making decisions that impact generations?

You know what would be a good thing for them? Term limits.

Disagree. If you hold any public office and fear for your safety, maybe you should do your f'ing job and work for the people, instead of yourself.

SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts heads a majority group of illegitimate, honorless, compromised, partisan, lying-under-oath deplorables whose goal is to strip all Human Rights from those who don't worship like them. Roberts: stand down, STFU. ExpandSCOTUS

Uhh .no plenty more judgy people in the world..

Safety is important. Too bad he's ethically challenged

like concealed carry

Ethics and accountability should be the focus of Roberts.

Extremist judges deserve their treatment.

They could also try to not be so worthy of such threats with their awful extremist activism

Yes, now he has another notch in his belt He owns the fact that the Supreme Court has fallen to corruption on his watch so talk to me he has become a failure in history books, and in reality, where to go, Roberts

They should live no differently than the rest of us. They're not nobles.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Court Watch with Alex Swoyer: Supreme Court takes on major First Amendment, LGBTQ battleThe Supreme Court heard a major battle between First Amendment rights and LGBTQ protections this month. Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the case fighting for her free speech rights, and her attorney Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom joined Alex Swoyer to comment on the oral arguments. Mike Davis, a former clerk to Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, also joined the episode to break down other major legal topics facing the justices this term, including the ongoing probe into who leaked the draft opinion earlier this year revealing the justices would overturn Roe v. Wade. 
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Year in Review: Five most consequential Supreme Court decisions of 2022The Supreme Court flexed its conservative muscle with several blockbuster decisions following its fall 2021-2022 term that had an immediate impact on state laws in 2022 — and will shape legal precedent for years to come. What do the judges think about the Biden MacBook 💻? Perhaps the most consequential decision the US Supreme Court could take. Are bank capital requirements with decreed risk weights: 0% Federal Government - 100% We the People, in accordance with the Constitution? Seemingly it does not want to hear the case.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

EPA finalizes contentious water rule despite pending case at U.S. Supreme CourtThe Biden administration on Friday finalized a rule protecting waterways that feed into rivers and lakes under the Clean Water Act, addressing a contentious question the U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing and restoring previous protections the Trump administration removed. Actually heard a great catch up with Mr Mrart3rs , I like his analysis of Crypto and Bitcoin, also his confidence in the Crypto space. I earn $20K in the next few weeks however is too high but just imagine it was correct. You can follow him for bitcoin earning tips😱 Ranchers and Farmers beware, they're coming for your livelihood again...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Questions Raised About Charity Tied to Supreme CourtA report in 'The New York Times' is raising questions about a charity tied to the U.S. Supreme Court that has raked in millions—a significant chunk of it from entities with matters before the justices. The Supreme Court is as corruptive as the trump administration. How much does a favorable ruling cost?
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »

Hundreds convicted by non-unanimous juries have right to new trial, Oregon Supreme Court rulesHundreds of defendants in Oregon who were convicted of crimes by non-unanimous juries before the U.S. Supreme Court struck down such jury verdicts have a right to a new trial, under a decision issued by the state's supreme court on Friday.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »