Cunnington's ruling held that the pretrial release provisions in the SAFE-T Act violated the Separation of Powers Clause, the Victim Rights Act, and unconstitutionally amended Article I, Section 9 of Illinois' constitution, which codified cash bail in the state.
Cunnington was swayed by the plaintiffs' argument that the state constitution provides for bail in stating, “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties,” while Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul's staff contended that the statement merely assures defendants that there's a way out pending trial.The elimination of cash bail was set to take effect Jan. 1, but will now be on hold as the Supreme Court prepares to hear the appeal.
This gives people more time to arm up.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Illinois Supreme Court halts implementation of cashless bailControversial provision of SAFE-T Act halted by state high court. Could have done that a month ago Illinois is a one-party state. Democrats control everything, thanks to the sheep-like Chicago & Cook County voters. States Attys like Kim Foxx want only to empty jails of minority felons. That’s what this is all about, and it won’t end well. Criminals saying, 'damn'
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »
Court Watch with Alex Swoyer: Supreme Court takes on major First Amendment, LGBTQ battleThe Supreme Court heard a major battle between First Amendment rights and LGBTQ protections this month. Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the case fighting for her free speech rights, and her attorney Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom joined Alex Swoyer to comment on the oral arguments. Mike Davis, a former clerk to Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, also joined the episode to break down other major legal topics facing the justices this term, including the ongoing probe into who leaked the draft opinion earlier this year revealing the justices would overturn Roe v. Wade.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Year in Review: Five most consequential Supreme Court decisions of 2022The Supreme Court flexed its conservative muscle with several blockbuster decisions following its fall 2021-2022 term that had an immediate impact on state laws in 2022 — and will shape legal precedent for years to come. What do the judges think about the Biden MacBook 💻? Perhaps the most consequential decision the US Supreme Court could take. Are bank capital requirements with decreed risk weights: 0% Federal Government - 100% We the People, in accordance with the Constitution? Seemingly it does not want to hear the case.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
EPA finalizes contentious water rule despite pending case at U.S. Supreme CourtThe Biden administration on Friday finalized a rule protecting waterways that feed into rivers and lakes under the Clean Water Act, addressing a contentious question the U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing and restoring previous protections the Trump administration removed. Actually heard a great catch up with Mr Mrart3rs , I like his analysis of Crypto and Bitcoin, also his confidence in the Crypto space. I earn $20K in the next few weeks however is too high but just imagine it was correct. You can follow him for bitcoin earning tips😱 Ranchers and Farmers beware, they're coming for your livelihood again...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Questions Raised About Charity Tied to Supreme CourtA report in 'The New York Times' is raising questions about a charity tied to the U.S. Supreme Court that has raked in millions—a significant chunk of it from entities with matters before the justices. The Supreme Court is as corruptive as the trump administration. How much does a favorable ruling cost?
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »
Hundreds convicted by non-unanimous juries have right to new trial, Oregon Supreme Court rulesHundreds of defendants in Oregon who were convicted of crimes by non-unanimous juries before the U.S. Supreme Court struck down such jury verdicts have a right to a new trial, under a decision issued by the state's supreme court on Friday.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »