Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Congressional District Maps

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 12 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 8%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court considers whether the Constitution renders state courts powerless to remedy gerrymandered maps drawn by state legislatures

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court considers Wednesday whether the Constitution renders state courts powerless to remedy gerrymandered maps drawn by state legislatures, having ruled in 2019 that federal courts have no authority to do so.

If the court agrees to end state-court efforts to review electoral maps, it will leave but one check on state legislatures: Congress, which under the Constitution gets the last word on the rules for congressional elections.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Many State Constitutions specifically say it's the State Legislature that draws their election maps. It's called 'Democracy' - Duh!

Voices of those who could never win a free, fair election, or play by rules.

Should be interesting!

Drawing congressional districts is a state legislative power as stated in the constitution. Black letter law. Lawyers are trying to find a way around that.

Fairly misleading headline. This would rule on whether state courts can intervene if they have no power to do so in that state's constitution.

Nope, but it does render them powerless for unconstitutional firearms laws, so it's time to go after gun control committees Nation wide.🇺🇸

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court hears case pitting free speech against LGBTQ rightsWhen the Supreme Court convenes for oral arguments Monday, it will be confronted with an issue it has been asked to resolve before in court fights involving bakers, a florist, and now, a web designer. Will see if the Supreme Court loses even more respectability, this should be a simple case, The State her company is registered in has a public accommodation law, but nothing is simple when the US version of the Morality Police is involved These elitist companies must have significant profits if they can pick and choose who they work for. It's not about rights. It's about an agenda.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court hears case that could undercut LGBTQ rightsThe Supreme Court will hear arguments today in a case that could undercut LGBTQ rights. The high court will consider whether a Colorado-based web designer is obligated under her state’s laws to design websites for weddings of same-sex couples. How many web designers do you think are in Colorado? Why are you harassing this person when you can just go to other companies 'Case that could undercut LGBTQ rights' Is this an editorial? The editor that approved this is clearly biased. I’d rather hire someone who believes I have a right to exist rather than force someone who hates me. Just saying.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court hears clash between LGBTQ and business owners' rightsThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a potential landmark case on LGBTQ rights. The case involves a web designer who claims Colorado law prevents her from designing wedding websites because she thinks marriage should only be between a man and a woman I wish her good luck! 'Design your own website.' so the opposite side of all the cases that keep being brought against the baker in CO.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court hears case of Colorado wedding website refusing gay marriage workThe Supreme Court is eyeing Colorado's law barring businesses from discriminating against gay, lesbian or transgender people in a free-speech challenge. I should start a gay marriage website. Pretty sure straight people would not come after me. You can't mandate people to work for you.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Hears Clash Between LGBTQ And Business Owners' RightsThe U.S. Supreme Court case pits guarantees that same-sex couples have equal access to all businesses that offer services to the public and business owners who say they don't want to use their talents to express a message that they don't believe in.
Source: LAist - 🏆 606. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Hears Religious Challenge to Colorado's Anti-Discrimination LawThe Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a Christian business owner's challenge to a Colorado anti-discrimination law. See the potential bias and similarities in coverage from lgbtqnation, washtimes and bbcworld:
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »