asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Three conservative justices already have voiced some support for the idea that the state court had improperly taken powers given by the Constitution when it comes to federal elections. A fourth has written approvingly about limiting the power of state courts in this area. That group includes former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, law professor Steven Calabresi, a founder of the conservative Federalist Society and Benjamin Ginsberg, a longtime lawyer for Republican candidates and the party.
He is among proponents of the high court’s intervention who argue the case doesn’t represent “a threat to democracy.” “The bottom line is the impact of this fringe theory would be terrible,” said former Attorney General Eric Holder, chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. “It could unleash a wave of gerrymandering from both parties.”
I trust the state courts less than I trust the Supreme Court, sad, Alaska used to be above all that trash!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court weighs 'most important case' on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency. The court is set to hear arguments Wednesday in a case from North Carolina, where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the state Supreme Court because the GOP map violated the state constitution. A court-drawn map produced seven seats for each party in last month's midterm elections in highly competitive North Carolina. Increase States powers? Constitutionally, the States already have the power to regulate their own election protocols. Federal government should stay out of State rights matters. Their multi-billionaire Unitary Executive GOP advocates & owners & donors want a favorable anti-democracy Ruling here 'So bad They can taste it Don’t state legislatures already have all the power? Isn’t that what’s written in our constitution?
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs case on state legislatures' power over federal electionsThe Supreme Court is about to confront an elections case that could dramatically alter voting and significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency. It’s where the power was always intended to be: with the states. Dems just want more central control and a huge federal government. really doesn't get it do they? It should be the power of the states the whole time. Who is running their twitter? At least read the Constitution first 😂 The Constitution gives state lawmakers full power over elections. This should come as no surprise as the federal government was created by states when they ratified the constitution. States wouldn't have signed on to federal intervention in state elections.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs increasing state lawmakers’ power during electionsThe court is set to hear arguments where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court. State legislators already have plenary power over election laws and the electoral college. This is delighted to them in the US Constitution. You mean they weigh ending democracy. Who will be making the arguments? Lawyers and AGs funded by Leonard Leo. Who will be ruling? 6 Justices hand picked by Leonard Leo. Sure they do. Because the SC is illegitimate. Bought and paid for by Conservatives.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracy, focused on power of state legislatures | amNewYorkThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: amNewYork - 🏆 336. / 59 Read more »
Opinion | Supreme Court Case 303 Creative Is About Power, Not Religious LibertyTogether we can work toward combating Christian nationalism and continue striving for a more inclusive America—with or without the Supreme Court of the United States. 303 needs to go 404
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: SpectrumNews1TX - 🏆 333. / 59 Read more »