asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
The Republican leaders of North Carolina’s legislature told the Supreme Court that the Constitution’s “carefully drawn lines place the regulation of federal elections in the hands of state legislatures, Congress and no one else.” If the court were to recognize it now, opponents of the concept argue, the effects could be much broader than just redistricting.
Jason Snead, of the conservative Honest Elections Project, said the case is an opportunity for the high court to rein in out-of-control state courts which are being pushed by Democratic attorneys to effectively create new rules governing voting, including the Georgia example. The New Yorkers implicitly recognize that if the court gives more power to state legislatures over drawing congressional lines, Republicans may not necessarily benefit.
The Supreme Court refused to step into the North Carolina case in March, allowing the court-drawn districts to be used this year.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Opinion | Supreme Court Case 303 Creative Is About Power, Not Religious LibertyTogether we can work toward combating Christian nationalism and continue striving for a more inclusive America—with or without the Supreme Court of the United States. 303 needs to go 404
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
California supreme court tosses gang murder conspiracy caseThe California Supreme Court on Thursday threw out the conspiracy-to-murder conviction of a gang member who used social media to applaud the killing of rivals during a San Diego gang war. YES!!! Let all violent gang members out of jail on random technicalities. Way to go CA! OMG…..
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »
Both sides see high stakes in gay rights Supreme Court caseThe Supreme Court is being warned about the potentially dire consequences of a case next week involving a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for same-sex couples. Consequences? Go to another graphic artist to do your website……this is not hard What ever happened to “no shoes, no shirt, no service” .. if you have a business you should have the right to serve who you want. I’m thinking it’s time the government stops telling Americans what to think, what to like and pick for me who i vote for. Hands of the judiciary. Warnings, threats, and other interference against the Court are un American
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Both Sides See High Stakes In Gay Rights Supreme Court CaseThe Supreme Court is being warned about the potentially dire consequences of a case next week involving a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for same-sex couples. Pretty sure this was covered in the Marriage Equality bill. If same sex marriage is legal in your state you can't discriminate. Warned? ☕️ 🫖
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments in Colorado same-sex discrimination caseThe case of an evangelical Christian designer from Colorado who refuses to build websites for same-sex couples lands in the U.S. Supreme Court for oral arguments. There are SO MANY MORE TALENTED WEB DESIGNERS than just her (not a slight to her), but go to them for God sakes. Acting like there's only one web/graphic designer in the world is ludicrous Next week's headline: 'Supreme Court legalizes all discrimination in historic 6-3 vote' Gee I wonder how the court of ChristianShariaLaw will rule?
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Both sides see high stakes in gay rights Supreme Court case | amNewYorkThe Supreme Court is being warned about the potentially dire consequences of a case next week involving a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for same-sex couples. I don’t get cases like this. I’m pro choice, pro gay marriage etc but why should this bigot have to do work for someone she doesn’t want to work for? Christians , & others , have the right to refuse servicing a religiously offensive issue . That's real equality , under the law. Remember : God's laws came 1st , & come 1st. Legalizing a sin does not stop it from being a sin. USA FirstAmendment Freedom
Source: amNewYork - 🏆 336. / 59 Read more »