Supreme Court weighs 'most important case' on democracy

asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.

The Republican leaders of North Carolina's legislature told the Supreme Court that the Constitution's “carefully drawn lines place the regulation of federal elections in the hands of state legislatures, Congress and no one else.” That group includes former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, law professor Steven Calabresi, a founder of the conservative Federalist Society and Benjamin Ginsberg, a longtime lawyer for Republican candidates and the party.

He is among proponents of the high court's intervention who argue the case doesn’t represent “a threat to democracy.” “The bottom line is the impact of this fringe theory would be terrible,” said former Attorney General Eric Holder, chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. “It could unleash a wave of gerrymandering from both parties.”

SCOTUS to the DemocRat & RINO Party: Watch it sucka, or we pull the Brunson card on you all;

Don’t state legislatures already have all the power? Isn’t that what’s written in our constitution?

Their multi-billionaire Unitary Executive GOP advocates & owners & donors want a favorable anti-democracy Ruling here 'So bad They can taste it

Increase States powers? Constitutionally, the States already have the power to regulate their own election protocols. Federal government should stay out of State rights matters.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court weighs increasing state lawmakers’ power during electionsThe court is set to hear arguments where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court. State legislators already have plenary power over election laws and the electoral college. This is delighted to them in the US Constitution. You mean they weigh ending democracy. Who will be making the arguments? Lawyers and AGs funded by Leonard Leo. Who will be ruling? 6 Justices hand picked by Leonard Leo. Sure they do. Because the SC is illegitimate. Bought and paid for by Conservatives.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracy, focused on power of state legislatures | amNewYorkThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: amNewYork - 🏆 336. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: SpectrumNews1TX - 🏆 333. / 59 Read more »

Why I’m asking the Supreme Court to affirm my free speech, and yours tooOpinion | Lorie Smith: Why I’m asking the Supreme Court to affirm my free speech, and yours too WashTimesOpEd
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs 'most important case' on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case that could dramatically alter voting in 2024 and beyond. Corrupt court.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »