Supreme Court weighs increasing state lawmakers’ power during elections

  • 📰 nypost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 67%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The court is set to hear arguments where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court.

asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.

The Republican leaders of North Carolina’s legislature told the Supreme Court that the Constitution’s “carefully drawn lines place the regulation of federal elections in the hands of state legislatures, Congress and no one else.” The most robust ruling for North Carolina Republicans could undermine more than 170 state constitutional provisions, over 650 state laws delegating authority to make election policies to state and local officials, and thousands of regulations down to the location of polling places, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law.

He is among proponents of the high court’s intervention who argue the case doesn’t represent “a threat to democracy.” Benjamin Ginsberg said the the fight for the redistricting case is “further undermining confidence in our elections.”“The bottom line is the impact of this fringe theory would be terrible,” said former Attorney General Eric Holder, chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. “It could unleash a wave of gerrymandering from both parties.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Good. Put a stop to it SCOTUSblog

The laws of powers is already written in the Constitution anything else isn’t valid

Sure they do. Because the SC is illegitimate. Bought and paid for by Conservatives.

State legislators already have plenary power over election laws and the electoral college. This is delighted to them in the US Constitution.

You mean they weigh ending democracy. Who will be making the arguments? Lawyers and AGs funded by Leonard Leo. Who will be ruling? 6 Justices hand picked by Leonard Leo.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 91. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court set to weigh ‘most important case’ on democracyA Republican-led challenge is asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency Gerrymandering gives too much weight to the winning of an election and I wish there were a non-partisan way to algorithmically draw congressional lines. However, I also believe the court overstepped when it overruled the districts drawn by the legislature.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracy, focused on power of state legislatures | amNewYorkThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency.
Source: amNewYork - 🏆 336. / 59 Read more »

What Will the Supreme Court Say About Biden's Loan Forgiveness Plan?The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on the Biden administration's student loan forgiveness plan in February. See the potential bias and similarities in coverage from FDRLST, SCOTUSblog, and cnn:
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments for Student Debt Cancellation in FebruaryThe Supreme Court has agreed to take up a case originally filed by Republican-led states to challenge President Joe Biden’s student debt cancellation plan. Until then, the cancellation plan will be on hold. Don't know why the WH spokesperson says they're happy. SCOTUS will side with the states, no question about it. You've got an adversarial Supreme Court that has openly declared war on the Biden administration. There's no daylight between the court & the Republican party. None.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »

California supreme court tosses gang murder conspiracy case from San DiegoThe state's high court said in a ruling Thursday that “being a cheerleader” isn’t enough to show that a San Diego gang member conspired in the murders. The case stemmed from a 2011 gang war between the Crips and the Bloods in the San Diego area.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »

House Committee to Investigate Alito Leak, Right-Wing Lobbying at Supreme Court'It's clear that some of these justices are simply incapable of behaving ethically or putting the law before politics, and the court is unwilling or unable to police itself.'
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »