Supreme Court struggles with a case dealing with the rights of Native American Tribes

  • 📰 NPR
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 67 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority seemed conflicted Wednesday, as the justices heard arguments challenging the Indian Child Welfare Act, known by the acronym 'ICWA.'

. But the tribes and the U.S. government countered that the courts have long considered American Indians to be a political group, not a racial group.

Like several other justices, he said the objections to ICWA in reality are objections to the policy choices that Congress adopted in the law. Your arguments"are better addressed across the street," he said. Meaning, that if some people don't like the law, they should go to Congress, not to the courts.

Justice Elena Kagan noted that ICWA was enacted for a particular purpose--namely to protect the tribes very existence at a time when huge numbers of Native children were being taken, often by force, from their tribal homes. But several conservative justices noted that the court would not, and has not, accepted laws that ban children from being adopted by parents of a different race. That, they noted would be a clear case of race discrimination.

Those challenging ICWA maintained that Congress cannot legislate for American Indians who do not live on a reservation. That prompted Justice Gorsuch to observe that in the West, American Indians live on a"checkerboard" of land, with many on reservations, and their Indian neighbors living close by, though not on reservations.

Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler said the purpose of ICWA is to prevent children from being taken away from their"families, from their extended families, from their tribes and their kin."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It’s weird to me when there seems to be a fairly clear precedent (Alaskans-who were never given treaties) where children were clearly separated from other groups by nonpolitical markers, such as “and children of mixed blood” in Nielsen Act of 1905.

pdeppisch

ActivistJudiciary

Justice Elena Kagan noted that ICWA was enacted for a particular purpose--namely to protect the tribes very existence at a time when huge numbers of Native children were being taken, often by force, from their tribal home.

Conflicting views ..

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 96. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court weighs challenge to Native American adoption lawDecades-old law aimed at protecting Native American children and buttressing tribal identity goes before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court divided on adoption law that keeps Native American kids in tribal homesThe Supreme Court sounded split on a federal child custody law that sends Native American children to be adopted by tribal families. Why would anyone disagree with this policy? The christian terrorists on the SC want to take the children like the Russian kidnappers who assist them to get appointed Is that a surprise?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court divided on law that gives preference to Native families in adoption proceedingsThree of the court’s liberals strongly defended the law, but four of the court’s conservatives were skeptical of the race-based preferences in the Indian Child Welfare Act, saying they sometimes prevent adoptions that might be in the best interest of the child.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

Justices hearing challenge seem to favor most of Indian Child Welfare Act“Congress understood these children’s placement decisions as integral to the continued thriving of Indian communities,” said liberal Justice Elena Kagan, one of four who seemed strongly inclined today to uphold the Indian Child Welfare Act in its entirety.
Source: AKpublicnews - 🏆 387. / 55 Read more »