The justices heard more than three hours of arguments in a broad challenge to the
Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the case difficult because the court is being called on to draw a line between tribal sovereignty and “the fundamental principle that we don’t treat people differently because of race, ethnicity or ancestry.” But none of the non-Native families involved in the case has been affected by the preference the conservative justices objected to, Justice Department lawyer Edwin Kneedler told the court.
Representing the non-Native families, lawyer Matthew McGill called on the court to strike down the law because it “flouts the promise of equal justice under law.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court considers fate of landmark Indian adoption lawIn a case steeped in American history the court will decide whether the Indian Child Welfare Act — aimed at preventing Native American children from being separated from their tribes — is tribal protection or racial classification.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court considers fate of landmark Indian adoption lawThe Supreme Court is hearing a case challenging the Indian Child Welfare Act — a law that gives preference in the adoption process to kids' own extended families and tribes to keep them from being separated. Too bad the taliban run Supreme Court only pretend to care about “kids” before they are born The Supreme Court needs to cool its heels, taking away clean water, bodily autonomy & the protections for native children…wtf I was taken from my tribe before this law and have a wonderful adopted family but still….. this is just WRONG
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »