Supreme Court justices sounded sharply split Wednesday on whether to strike down a federal child custody law that seeks to keep Native American children with tribal families.
Last week, the court heard arguments on whether to strike down the use of race as a factor in college admissions, and several of the conservative justices said the issue in Wednesday’s case looked similar. The 1978 law was an effort by Congress to impose minimum federal standards for those adoptions not handled by tribal courts, particularly in cases of governmental removal of children from their families because of safety or social welfare concerns. Among other things, the law requires notifying the tribe if a child of a tribal member is placed for adoption.
More than a third of Native American children were being removed from their families in some states, Congress said at the time. And 90% of those children were placed with non-Native American families. Critics of the law say it has sometimes worked against the best interest of the children by sending them to live with distant relatives they have never known, rather than allowing them to be adopted by their current foster families.
Is that a surprise?
The christian terrorists on the SC want to take the children like the Russian kidnappers who assist them to get appointed
Why would anyone disagree with this policy?
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court weighs challenge to Native American adoption lawDecades-old law aimed at protecting Native American children and buttressing tribal identity goes before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Law on American Indian AdoptionsSupreme Court justices heard lawsuits on Wednesday challenging federal law that promotes the adoption of American Indian children by American Indian families StopHazaraGenocide
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
California Supreme Court: Who's Running In The Nov. 8 General Election And Why It MattersUnlike the U.S. Supreme Court, California’s highest court is more obscure and rarely issues polarizing opinions.
Source: LAist - 🏆 606. / 51 Read more »
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Issues Her First Supreme Court OpinionNew Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has issued her first Supreme Court opinion, a short dissent Monday in support of a death row inmate from Ohio. Surprise, she probably wants him free on bail Has she figured out what a woman is yet? In just a short while,she has did more than someone who was there for over twenty years. His wife cause more concerned to the people then he does. No one elected her for anything. Yes she injected her in the public affairs.
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »
Jackson Issues First Dissent Over Supreme Court Refusal to Hear Death Row AppealIn her first opinion—a dissent—U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson said she would have heard the appeal of an Ohio death row inmate who argues the state suppressed evidence during his trial. Honestly I am not a fan of Joe Biden. But in my opinion Biden appointing Justice Jackson to SCOTUS is definitely one of the best things he’s done in office. Kentanji is someone I actually look up to, she’s an inspirational figure.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »