Speaker Nancy Pelosi told Democrats in a letter Monday that the House will pass the bills"this week" to enshrine those rights in order “to protect freedom in our nation, as extremist Justices and lawmakers take aim at more of our basic rights.”
“Because Loving was plainly correct,” he said, arguing that that decision was based on the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which he said, “was passed to eliminate government racial discrimination.” "I'm really sorry to say that, but Clarence Thomas was very clear in his position here. I wish it weren't necessary but I think it is," Durbin said in response to a question from NBC News."I can remember when states regulated birth control — you would go into a gas station, into the men's room, and there was a condom machine. And it had a label on it: 'For the prevention of disease only.
But many Republican senators are wary of alienating their culturally conservative base, which is disillusioned by the pace of social change in the United States and has little interest in seeing their elected representatives codify those rights. Last week, RepublicansAnd on Monday, Senate Republicans appeared conflicted when asked if same-sex marriage and contraception should be rights.
"I don't know that we need to codify things like that. Shouldn't that be states and local jurisdictions, maybe?" she said."I would just have to see how it's worded. But, no, I think women should have access to contraception. But it depends on the definition of contraception."
The High Court is out of control and the far right doesn’t reflect the will of the people They legislate Tyranny not freedom. POTUS and Congress need to work together to: DEFUND_SCOTUS. Increase_Justices_to_13. One Justice for each appellate court in the U.S.
Well let’s play their game then. Let’s outlaw hunting to protect all wildlife and throw people in prison for it. Yes? No? They wanna play dumb? Well let’s stoop to their dumbness and outlaw hunting. See how they like that one. huntingroe
you mean the democrats
So what took them this long. Oh they needed to be able to use it for votes when they’re polling numbers are in the tank.
SCOTUS already said same sex marriage is legal. PR again.
Maybe if it’s taken…you’ll reel back the weird fetishes, gender ideology and drag grooming. Not much further on the slippery slope to go. Getting a bit out of hand.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
House Will Vote On Protecting Same-Sex Marriages In Light Of Supreme Court RulingThe bill ensures same-sex marriages will be recognized nationwide, and that any marriages that took place since Obergefell v. Hodges will remain valid even if the Supreme Court overturns it.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court Term in Review: Experts Warn of a Court Coming for Your RightsThis week, Michele Goodwin hosted six law and women's rights experts at the University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Law to discuss the Supreme Court's latest impactful rulings, including Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, West Virginia v. EPA, and more.'The writing has been on the wall for a long time,' said Erwin Chemerinsky at the July 6 event. 'This term was in one sense not a surprise, but it was shocking to see decision after decision come down in a conservative way.' michelebgoodwin ma_franks If a law is unjust, in its nature, in its agency, and in its purpose, it is false law.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »
Lawmakers Answer Supreme Court Threat to LGBTQ+ Equality With Respect for Marriage Act'It's past time for Congress to establish that marriage equality is the law of the land and ensure Americans across the country can continue to marry who they love without discrimination,' Rep. Mondaire Jones said of the Respect for Marriage Act. RepMondaire Again, fascists overstep boundaries of what they get to control! They do not get to decide this!
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
How the Supreme Court recalibrated the abortion debate in just 3 wordsIt's not just that US Supreme Court majorities upheld Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban and overturned Roe v. Wade. The opinion also skewed the crux of the conversation going forward -- with just three words. 1 issue for me , going forward RIP : the idea of requiring journalists to be ‘proficient’ in: The existence/employment of a friggin predicate, conceptual understanding of complex sentence construction, or ever wandering outside of Plato’s cave.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Ted Cruz says legalizing gay marriage was ‘clearly wrong’ decision by Supreme Court'I think the decision was clearly wrong when it was decided. It was the court overreaching,' said Ted Cruz about the 2015 case that legalized gay marriage in the United States. Nobody is forcing him to marry a guy. He’s just jealous because 2 people of the same sex can love each other more than his wife loves him. SenTedCruz Cruz is one of the main supporters in suppressing women's free choice, LGBT equal rights, and the democratic Republic. VOTE OUT CRUZ! God says that marriage is made up of one man and one woman. Nothing else qualifies as marriage.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Sen. Ted Cruz Says Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling Was IncorrectGay marriage could be next to go as a national right, assuming the Supreme Court falls in line with Ted Cruz's thinking here. Let’s all pretend like there wasn’t such a thing as civil unions before gay marriage was passed. Not true This is what happens when judges rule based on ideology. It emboldens the far right
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »