The legislation was introduced in light of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, which raised the possibility it could overturn its ruling on same-sex marriage next.
The bill requires states to recognize marriages that took place legally in other states or jurisdictions regardless of “sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin.” That means states can’t declare same-sex marriages or interracial marriages invalid even if they’re outlawed in that state, as long as the marriage took place legally in the state where it was performed.
The bill also protects marriage equality under federal law by saying any federal laws that involve someone’s marital status recognize the marriage as valid as long as it was legal in the state or territory where it was performed. If the Supreme Court does overturn same-sex marriage, marriages that took place while it was still legal would be protected, as the bill states that the validity of a marriage is based only on what the laws were at the time the marriage took place and so can’t be nullified retroactively.The House will vote on the Respect for Marriage Act this week, House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Term in Review: Experts Warn of a Court Coming for Your RightsThis week, Michele Goodwin hosted six law and women's rights experts at the University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Law to discuss the Supreme Court's latest impactful rulings, including Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, West Virginia v. EPA, and more.'The writing has been on the wall for a long time,' said Erwin Chemerinsky at the July 6 event. 'This term was in one sense not a surprise, but it was shocking to see decision after decision come down in a conservative way.' michelebgoodwin ma_franks If a law is unjust, in its nature, in its agency, and in its purpose, it is false law.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »
MSNBC contributor claims Supreme Court will allow 'authoritarian takeover' of U.S.The Nation's Elie Mystal told MSNBC host Tiffany Cross that Trump supporters will launch an 'authoritarian takeover' of the country 'made legal' by the Supreme Court. This guy is crazier than he looks and he looks pretty crazy! Where has he/her/they been? The authoritarian takeover started in the Spring of 2020. Absolutely correct.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
How the Supreme Court recalibrated the abortion debate in just 3 wordsIt's not just that US Supreme Court majorities upheld Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban and overturned Roe v. Wade. The opinion also skewed the crux of the conversation going forward -- with just three words. 1 issue for me , going forward RIP : the idea of requiring journalists to be ‘proficient’ in: The existence/employment of a friggin predicate, conceptual understanding of complex sentence construction, or ever wandering outside of Plato’s cave.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Ted Cruz says legalizing gay marriage was ‘clearly wrong’ decision by Supreme Court'I think the decision was clearly wrong when it was decided. It was the court overreaching,' said Ted Cruz about the 2015 case that legalized gay marriage in the United States. Nobody is forcing him to marry a guy. He’s just jealous because 2 people of the same sex can love each other more than his wife loves him. SenTedCruz Cruz is one of the main supporters in suppressing women's free choice, LGBT equal rights, and the democratic Republic. VOTE OUT CRUZ! God says that marriage is made up of one man and one woman. Nothing else qualifies as marriage.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Sen. Ted Cruz Says Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling Was IncorrectGay marriage could be next to go as a national right, assuming the Supreme Court falls in line with Ted Cruz's thinking here. Let’s all pretend like there wasn’t such a thing as civil unions before gay marriage was passed. Not true This is what happens when judges rule based on ideology. It emboldens the far right
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Sen. Ted Cruz says Supreme Court 'clearly wrong' in decision legalizing same-sex marriageThe Texas Republican's remarks came just weeks after Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court “should reconsider” past rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges. tedcruz is about fifty years late with his opinion. Meanwhile women have been making biological choices; the Republican woke. RoeVWade Keep digging GOP, try to ban gay marriage. GOP’s extremism is finally repulsing the public. Trying to make a 10 year old rape victim carry rapists child, is bridge too far, even for the most heartless. And denying climate change is real, while we all bake, is waking folks up. Of course
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »