Lawmakers Answer Supreme Court Threat to LGBTQ+ Equality With Respect for Marriage Act

  • 📰 commondreams
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

'It's past time for Congress to establish that marriage equality is the law of the land and ensure Americans across the country can continue to marry who they love without discrimination,' RepMondaire said of the Respect for Marriage Act.

"I've been with my husband Randy for 30 years, but we've only spent eight of them as a legally married couple," Maloney explained."For families like mine, the Respect for Marriage Act is a necessary step to protect our fundamental rights."openly gay Black men elected to Congress.made clear that marriage equality is next on the chopping block."made clear that marriage equality is next on the chopping block," said Jones.

The bill's introduction comes after Sen. Ted Cruz came under fire for saying—as some other Republicans in Congress have recentlyAmong those who criticized Cruz was Rep. Mark Pocan , one of the caucus members backing the new bill. "This is deeply personal to me. My husband, Phil, and I have been married for more than 15 years," Pocan said."The House and Senate need to pass the Respect for Marriage Act immediately to protect marriage equality."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

RepMondaire Again, fascists overstep boundaries of what they get to control! They do not get to decide this!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 530. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Cruz: Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling was ‘clearly wrong’For much of the American mainstream, the debate over marriage equality is over. For many prominent Republicans, it is not. Take Ted Cruz, for example. MaddowBlog hey america you can no longer ever say you are the freest country - YOU ARE NOT MaddowBlog “‘Homosexuality was well known in the ancient world, well before Christ was born, and Jesus never said a word about homosexuality. In all of his teachings about multiple things — he never said that gay people should be condemned.’ — Jimmy Carter” MaddowBlog Where in the constitution does it guarantee homosexual marriage?
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

House Will Vote On Protecting Same-Sex Marriages In Light Of Supreme Court RulingThe bill ensures same-sex marriages will be recognized nationwide, and that any marriages that took place since Obergefell v. Hodges will remain valid even if the Supreme Court overturns it.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Sen. Ted Cruz Says Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling Was IncorrectGay marriage could be next to go as a national right, assuming the Supreme Court falls in line with Ted Cruz's thinking here. Let’s all pretend like there wasn’t such a thing as civil unions before gay marriage was passed. Not true This is what happens when judges rule based on ideology. It emboldens the far right
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz calls 2015 Supreme Court's same-sex marriage ruling 'clearly wrong''I think that decision was clearly wrong when it was decided. It was the court overreaching.' Now watch what happens… Here come the ad hominems and you’ll also notice a lack of engagement in the *actual argument*. And guessing at least 90% of commenters won’t have even read Obergefell. Oh my. His opinion isn’t mainstream?!? What shall we ever do? Let's hope the Equal Protection Clause holds up in any future attacks on gay marriage.
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »

Senator Ted Cruz Says Supreme Court Was Wrong In Same-Sex Marriage RulingSen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Saturday said he believes the U.S. Supreme Court “was overreaching” and “clearly wrong” when it legalized same-sex marriage across the country in the 2015 landmark Obergefell v. Hodges decision. He's right. The individual states should be allowed to determine what they want. Just like they are doing with abortion.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »