The Supreme Court has sided with usurping Remainers over the people

For centuries there has been a battle between the Anglo Saxon view of what constitutes a liberal, democratic constitution, centred on the people and liberty and the continental, “statist”, state-centred view.

john4brexit But the prorogation was nothing to do with Brexit apparently?

john4brexit Oh Jesus Christ, what is wrong with you ‘people’? You really have no limits, do you? You’re determined to divide using barely disguised hatred and partisan language. Some people acknowledge both sides have their faults - and some just can’t (too stupid) or won’t (too biased).

john4brexit They didn’t ‘side’ with anyone. They looked at the law and came to an unanimous conclusion.

john4brexit They don't look at the bigger picture. Democracy is at risk. 11 old people only look at the motivate behind the prorogation of parliament, they need to look deeper and at the motivate of the people who brought the challenge of the prorongation.

john4brexit Telegraph is now Fox News 👿👿

john4brexit They have decided that the PM was not within his rights in suspending parliamentary democracy.

john4brexit Fuck the Barclay brothers tax dodging cuntwipes who are only concerned with imminent changes to their offshore tax arrangements

john4brexit Oh stop bloody moaning. Accept the desision and move on.

john4brexit Yes, ironically the Supreme Court has acted to maintain the sovereignty of parliament something Brexit was supposed to deliver. In short, Brexit is no longer needed.

john4brexit If Brexit doesn't happen than then the MPs in Parliament have failed this country and should step down. If they do no do Brexit then MPs in Parliament have failed to do their job and have failed this country.

john4brexit More bollocks from the Tory Brexit propaganda rag.

john4brexit 11-0. Boris is a criminal

john4brexit How can the court side withe remainers when the government argument was that prorogation was not about Brexit. Giving your readers such gross misrepresentation of the ruling simply shows how the Telegraph is now another cheap tabloid and no longer a real newspaper.

john4brexit The ruling WAS NOT about Brexit

john4brexit Rubbish Article

john4brexit The justices did not sided with anyone! They looked at the law and made independent decision! BJ says Prorogation has nothing to do with Brexit so the SC decision has nothing to do with Brexit or Remain!

john4brexit Truly shocking and undemocratic.

joerichlaw john4brexit Rule of law anyone

joerichlaw john4brexit Terrible headline. I thought prorogation wasn’t about Brexit?

FullerDenis john4brexit This is an inaccurate and dangerous view.

john4brexit What a rag you have become. Posh boys Express. The verdict was unanimous.

john4brexit All Telegraph tweets should come with an idiocy warning and the paper should only be sold in plastic bags from the top shelf. Disgraceful rag!

john4brexit This ruling simply trashed the reputations of 3 of the highest judges in the UK .The Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls and President of the Queen’s Bench Division all disagreed with the SC’s decision. Yet we arrived at a 11.0 verdict ,not one dissenting voice IT STINKS!

john4brexit They will get their comeuppance

john4brexit Quite disgraceful to question the integrity, intelligence and independence of these judges.

john4brexit Utterly disgusting headline.

john4brexit FailingTelegraph sides with its billionaire owners and all its other filthy-rich greedy cronies, in defiance of the law. So no change there then.

john4brexit I’m not happy with the conclusion. I demand a second review from the courts

john4brexit FGS! They didn’t ‘side’ with anyone. It’s a court and a judgment was made based on facts.

john4brexit What a dangerous headline.

john4brexit Our country has been known to do very heinous things to regimes that don't honor fair elections.

john4brexit Perhaps I don’t understand but isn’t this just about halting prorogue? If it wasn’t intentional, (this might be the result wanted) then it was a thoughtless idea by Boris, which has made the situation more difficult & I’d like to know what he was thinking of. 1/

john4brexit Why not. We do not want Dictators in the UK and we do not want papers that are run by moaners.

john4brexit

john4brexit Even the U.K. PM isn’t above the law, the judges didn’t ask or question if Johnson actions where a political issue, merely that his reasoning for 5 week suspension during hugely important constitutional crisis was questionable. Move along please.....

john4brexit Agreed. A president has now been set where any decision by parliament can be challenged/changed via the Supreme Court regardless. This is a political decision by eleven people to hijack parliament and control the country. Very bad ruling

john4brexit ‘The people’, an interesting term, please define what ‘the people’ means.

john4brexit Ironic, I thought brexiteers were pursuing parliamentary sovereignty as a reason for leaving the EU. The SC ruled in favour of parliamentary sovereignty!

john4brexit But according to brexiters proroguing parliament had “nothing to do with brexit” and was just a “totally normal procedure” ...🤔 so how has it got anything to do with “remainers”?

john4brexit If you still have 17.4M votes put it up for another vote or are you a bunch of chickens?

john4brexit Of course they have. Couldn’t possibly be that they found your beloved Boris guilty of a very serious offense. 👀

john4brexit Corrected that for you: The 11 independent Justices of The Supreme Court have judged the case professionally and to the highest standards of legal rigour, upholding the rule of law, as expected of the best judiciary in the world for which Britain should be rightly proud.

john4brexit We won get over it🤣🤣brexitshambles

john4brexit Get that revolting grin go woman off this page . She should be deported along with all the rest . Who’s paying you to do this ?

john4brexit

john4brexit

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Andrew Neil grills Chuka Umunna for failing to challenge Boris - ‘You are frightened!’CHUKA UMUNNA was savagely grilled by Andrew Neil on a special BBC broadcast after the Supreme Court ruled Boris Johnson has prorogued Parliament “unlawfully” sparking Remainer MPs to call for his resignation. They are all frightened otherwise we would have an election
Source: Daily Express - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »

Brexiteer in furious rant at ‘100% Remain’ Supreme Court - vows to return power to peopleA BREXITEER has furiously attacked the decision to rule Boris Johnson’s prorogation of Parliament as unlawful, raging the Supreme Court is “100 percent Remain” and vowing to “put the people back in charge” after Brexit. The people want a general election, when do we want it NOW!
Source: Daily Express - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »

Lady Hale: a career of breaking barriers in the judiciarySupreme court’s first female leader reached position by unusual route and is champion of diversity As mulleres na xustiza británica dando un golpe na mesa, coma aquí, se lles deixasen. How does one gage Barrier Breaking? It is quite simple my dear Sirs: One knows it when one sees it!
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

LIVE: Blow for Johnson as Supreme Court rules parliament is not suspendedThe SupremeCourt ruling 'has disrupted the Labour Party conference' but it has also 'unified the frontbench'. Sky News' Political Editor BethRigby says the conference exploded with the chants 'Johnson out' upon hearing the result. Follow live: thatginamiller thatginamiller Another self elected nobody telling us what to think thatginamiller What is her ulterior motive. Will she lose vast amounts of money and business status WHEN NOT IF we leave the EU.
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »

LIVE: Johnson says Supreme Court ruling is a 'verdict we shall respect'Gina Miller insists that the Supreme Court ruling that the suspension of parliament was unlawful was 'not about leaving the European Union'. Get the latest here: There, I have to agree with her. It was about 11 mind-readers who somehow knew that Johnson had lied to the Queen, and thereby challenged the 'supremacy' of Beardy and Co, sorry, I mean Parliament. Liar Another victory for this spoiled overly indulged remainder
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »

Steve Bell on Boris Johnson's suspension of parliament – cartoonPM repeats condemnation of supreme court ruling that prorogation was unlawful Oh ya they both lie through their front teeth Doesn’t BorisJohnson resemble donaldtrump \\ Steve Bell's 'illustrations' are often sexist, and not particularly funny or enlightening.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »