with an eye toward a spring 2020 theatrical release for the timely gerrymandering documentary.
The documentary directed by Barak Goodman and Chris Durrance could hardly have more urgency given the ruling Thursday by the U.S. Supreme Court that federal judges must stay out of gerrymandering disputes, a decision that effectively gives state legislatures unfettered authority to redraw electoral maps as a tactic for consolidating political power. The ruling split the court and gives a major advantage to the incumbent party that is currently in power in each state’s legislature.
“We were inspired to make this film because of the passion and courage of the people like Katie Fahey and the members of the Wisconsin legal team, who have dedicated their lives to creating a democracy in which every citizen’s vote counts,” Goodman and Durrance said in a joint statement. “We are thrilled that Magnolia has come on board, recognizing the impact a film like this can have at such an important time in the history of our country.
Magnolia president Eamonn Bowles said the documentary illuminates a genuine menace that could undermine the political process in every corner of the country. “Gerrymandering is one of the biggest threats to our democracy andis a fantastic primer to what’s at stake, in addition to an incredibly cinematic, emotional film. Barak Goodman and Chris Durrance have done a marvelous job telling this story.”Food Inc.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court decides federal courts cannot police gerrymanderingThe Supreme Court ruled that federal courts cannot rule in cases of partisan gerrymandering in cases from Maryland and North Carolina. NBC News' Pete Williams reports from the court steps. Maybe it's time to re-think the whole idea of a Supreme Court. They have become so partisan that they are basically useless when it comes to making non-partisan policy for United States citizens. Abolish the SCOTUS and create something new. Sad.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
The Supreme Court says federal courts have no role in preventing partisan gerrymanderingChief Justice John Roberts said the majority of the districting plans are ‘highly partisan’ but the courts are the wrong place to settle these disputes. What exactly is your role then. So patently obvious and egregious efforts to dismantle representative democracy are not worthy of federal judicial review? Stepping stone to revisiting Jim Crow laws?
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Partisan GerrymanderingAnthony Kennedy should be ashamed of himself for taking a pass on the opportunity to deal with this problem before heading off to retirement, writes ed_kilgore ed_kilgore I thought Gerrymandering was illegal ed_kilgore Leadership failure. and ed_kilgore ed_kilgore He’s not. Now what.
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court allows severe partisan gerrymandering to continueThe Supreme Court said Thursday that federal courts must stay out of disputes over when politicians go too far in drawing district lines for partisan gain -- a dramatic and sweeping ruling that could fundamentally affect the balance of power in state legislatures and Congress. Enjoy Gilead
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Set Limits on Political GerrymanderingBreaking: Supreme Court declines to impose limits on partisan redistricting, a ruling that deals a major blow to critics of partisan gerrymandering California switched to a committee to set up the districts... and nothing changed. This whole Gerrymandering thing is people who cant face the fact that their ideology just isn't that popular among their neighbors. So we won’t have fair elections, 5 republicans decided this 'critics of partisan gerrymandering' - i.e. fans of democracy, i.e. putative Americans.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »