WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court Friday agreed to decide whether Montana can block religiously affiliated schools from a state scholarship program intended to help needy families.
Shortly after the program was launched, a state agency imposed a restriction that barred giving any scholarship money to religious schools, invoking a provision of the Montana constitution that prohibits"any direct or indirect appropriation or payment ... to aid any church, school ... controlled in whole or in party by any church."
Lawyers for the women urged the Supreme Court to take the case, arguing that the justices have never squarely ruled on whether the government can block religiously affiliated options from generally available student aid programs.
Religious institutions are already tax exempt. They can fund their own friggin' schools. Tax payer funds should be used to fund public education.
Why do religious schools need aid from the state? If they pray to their their invisible gods. They will be given all that they need. That’s if someone is there and are listening.
Let's just remind the Court, it says separation of church and state.
With all the talk of student loan debt a scholarship to any private college would be good.
Simple ... Separation of state and Church
Billions Dollar Pedifiles need more aid to attract little boys to their Honeycomb Hideout
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court effectively blocks census citizenship question for now in a blow to Trump administrationThe Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a setback to the Trump administration's plans to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, effectively blocking the addition of the question for now. Partisan Supreme Court Name ? Refugee? Country--Stateless? Status-- Prison of Modrate Profession--Slavery Health__ edge of life Week of Rufugee?Or Rufusee Who is Rufused Non of Rufugee? Non of Citizen? Non of Pasajero? Non of Tourist? Non of Businessmen? Courts? Where is Court? What we are? Truth is Ahead?
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court to issue major census, electoral map decisionsThe U.S. Supreme Court is due to issue eagerly awaited decisions on Thursday in ...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Set Limits on Political GerrymanderingBreaking: Supreme Court declines to impose limits on partisan redistricting, a ruling that deals a major blow to critics of partisan gerrymandering California switched to a committee to set up the districts... and nothing changed. This whole Gerrymandering thing is people who cant face the fact that their ideology just isn't that popular among their neighbors. So we won’t have fair elections, 5 republicans decided this 'critics of partisan gerrymandering' - i.e. fans of democracy, i.e. putative Americans.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court decides federal judges cannot block gerrymanderingThe Supreme Court rules that federal courts may not block gerrymandering in a 5-4 decision that falls along partisan lines. This is wrong. The right for representation is a federal right. Of course a majority right winged court would rule that. I say burn down the court, its no longer the Supreme Court, they are just partisan republican hacks.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court allows gerrymandering in North Carolina, MarylandJUST IN: US Supreme Court rules in 5-4 vote that it cannot decide on the question of partisan gerrymandering, finding that 'partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.' - PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC If not them, who? Hello, God?
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects limits to partisan gerrymanderingIn a major blow to election reformers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected efforts to rein in the contentious practice of manipulating electoral district boundaries to entrench one party in power by turning away challenges to political maps in Maryland and North Carolina. The justices, in a
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »