Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross speaks at the National Press Club in Washington on May 14, 2018.
The Supreme Court, delivering a political blow to the Trump administration, on Thursday refused to uphold an effort to ask all households about the citizenship of their residents as part of the 2020 census. They sent the matter back to a lower court for review.
*for now. (An important addition to your headline)
barefootboomer It must have been the liberal 9th circuit Supreme Court. 😂
Borrow off the NAZI thinking about birthrights
BarbaraNavarro So good to hear
ImpeachJusticeRoberts
Wonderful!
More 'winning' I presume? WHOMP WHOMP
Did they reject it or pass it off to lower courts?
Um.... they literally said that they saw no problem with the question, but the reasoning for adding it wasn’t sufficient enough. Hence, if they come up with a better reason, they’ll allow it.
hipEchik Gotta love all those Justices Trump put on the court. Democrats put activist justices on the court we put Democrats on the court.
The headline should read SCOTUS allows gerrymandering to continue. Stop enabling progress!
Conservatives in liberal states like California should not respond to the census. Your count will only add to liberal Congressional representation. Your representation derives from conservative states like Texas.
So when does the naked mole rat lose his job for not lying well enough, realDonaldTrump? 🤡ETTD
You know that's not entirely correct.
But, isn’t a census to gather information for demographics.
😂😂😂
Expecting angry, misspelled tweets towards Roberts any second now.
Read a Times investigation on how the current census system categorizes race—and the changes some are pushing to shift how the government would count Middle Eastern and Latino communities.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »