Supreme Court affirms longstanding rule allowing individuals to be prosecuted by states and federal government for the same offense

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

SCOTUS upholds longstanding 'dual sovereignty' exception to double jeopardy clause

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to overturn a longstanding rule that allows for individuals to be charged by states and the federal government for the same offense.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Neil Gorsuch, in separate dissents, took issue with the majority's formula.Mark Wilson | Getty Images News | Getty Images The Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy clause states that "No person shall [...] be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Alito wrote that because states and the federal government are both sovereign governments, a violation of state and federal law is not the "same offense," but is instead separate offenses.

In her dissent, Ginsburg wrote that under the Constitution, it is the governed, not the governments, who are the ultimate sovereigns.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The world just got better.

Is it possible to have partial sovereignty? I'm under the impression that sovereignty is inherently complete, and no part of this union is sovereign in relation to the whole.

SenhorRaposa (didn’t see one of the dissents coming)

realDonaldTrump is probably less pleased with this than with Mullvaney daring to cough in his presence.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

If The Supreme Court Hears This Case, It Could Change The Face Of Public EducationThis summer the US Supreme Court is expected to decide whether or not to hear Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. If they hear the case, their decision will have huge repercussions for public education.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court sends gay wedding cake dispute back to state courtsThe Oregon case raises the same issues as the Colorado baker a year ago who refused to provide a custom cake for the wedding of two men. These cases are always weird to me. Like I get the discrimination is wrong but on the other hand, I don't want you making ANYTHING for me if you're a hateful bigot. I can’t believe in this day and age, there are no gay owned bakeries. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. With the court becoming more conservative (and without knowing how long RBG will remain on it) time seems to be the most influential factor. Not to mention their is a similar case rising through the courts pertaining to a florist.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects appeal from DC prep school studentThe Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a case brought by a former student at a prestigious Washington, DC, prep school who alleged discrimination affected her chances for college admission. Well...she couldn’t pass her math class either. Hasn't Sidwell recently come under fire for parents basically having bullied the counselors?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court declines to change double jeopardy rule in a case with Manafort implicationsTrump's former campaign manager might have been helped if the case involving an Alabama man on gun and robbery charges had been overturned. What’s hilarious is Manafort would have to admit to his crimes to receive a pardon from Trump. Then the state could charge him and basically have his confession as additional evidence. 🔥👏🏽 Watch out Trump. NY and NJ may be coming for you.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court dodges case of baker's refusal to serve gay customers on religious groundsThe Supreme Court on Monday sent back a case pitting religious liberty against LGBTQ rights to the lower courts for further consideration in light of last term's ruling in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple. Stories like these make no sense. That’s how you make money. Put your beliefs (no matter how antiquated they are) to the side. People are people. All that matter’s is how good the couple are. If they know ruling against the same sex couple will spark backlash and obviously hurt Trump then refusing to do so is COWARDICE. zipped
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

The executive editor of the LA Times says he helped his college girlfriend get an illegal abortionNorman Pearlstine, the executive editor of the Los Angeles Times, revealed in a piece for the newspaper on Sunday that a college girlfriend experienced a 'botched abortion' before the US Supreme Court legalized the procedure. Use birth control wouldn't need an abortion Some editor. The supreme court has no constitutional authority to legalize anything. He was irresponsible in college; constitutionally ignorant now. 인간의 존엄 거룩하고 고귀한 생명 망각하는 사랑의 창조 남 1% 즐거운 행복 여99% 희생과 봉사 고정관념 쾌락 마왕의 문화 동성애 등 우상화 정치 대립과 경쟁 기득권 노예 착하고 바르고 깨끗한 삶 진실을 비하 조작 왜곡 차단 은폐 음해 훼손 나 자신을 망각 몸 건너 맘 깨달음 빵상 황선자 예언!!!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »