FILE PHOTO: A bump fire stock that attaches to a semi-automatic rifle to increase the firing rate is seen at Good Guys Gun Shop in Orem, Utah, U.S., October 4, 2017. REUTERS/George Frey/File Photo
With two conservative justices dissenting, the court refused to temporarily exempt from the ban a group of plaintiffs including the Firearms Policy Foundation while their legal challenge continues to be litigated in Washington. The ban, which went into effect on March 26, was embraced by Trump following a 2017 massacre in Las Vegas that killed 58 people in which the gunman used bump stocks.
The challengers then returned to the Supreme Court to try to prevent the policy from applying specifically to them. In Friday’s order, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch said they would have granted the request to exempt the challengers.
Meh, you can make a firearms shoot just as fast as with a rubber band as you can with a bump stock and it's a lot cheaper.
🙌🏽🙌🏽✌🏽✌🏽
yes!
In fact, upholding this ban is about as noteworthy as upholding a ban on cigarette lighters during a natural gas leak. But, at least it's a teensy weensy baby step in the right direction.
That’ll show all those inner city NRA gang members that are shooting each other.👍🏻
'gun rights' hahahahaha America’s fucked beyond repair.
Can do the same thing with a belt loop anyways.
trump is coming for yur gunz 🤯
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Supreme Court rules that a murderer has no right to a “painless death”The 5-4 vote reveals stark differences among the justices AliciaB57865441 Medical conditions don’t matter if you commit murder but every murderer should get the least painful death possible And the argument of live birth abortion is what.......criminal now let's just find a doctor who'll defy his pledge
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Supreme Court denies request to put bump stock regulation on holdThe Supreme Court allows the federal ban on bump stocks to go into effect, denying a request from gun rights groups to temporarily block it NRA LLLLLLL hallelujah
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »
Suspect in New Zealand massacre to face more charges in court on FridayAustralian Brenton Tarrant will appear in court in New Zealand on Friday, where ... 😢 'Suspect'? Are you serious? He's a damn terrorist, a murderer! New Zealand is such a wonderful country. Setting great examples for decency, morality and unity.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
WaPo: Trump plans to fight tax returns up to the Supreme CourtThe Washington Post reports that according to two administration officials, 'Privately, Trump has told White House advisers that he does not plan to hand over his tax returns to Congress and that he would fight the issue to the Supreme Court, hoping to stall it until after the 2020 election.' Oh boy there is VERY damaging information about Donald Trump in his tax returns!! I guess you know we’re this is going What’s the big deal? Nothing to hide right?
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
The Supreme Court grants a Buddhist’s plea for a spiritual adviser at his executionThe 7-2 decision comes weeks after a 5-4 decision denying a Muslim man’s similar request I suspect it had something to do with which religion they request 😉 No surprise. Unfortunately a Muslim goes in already judged. Kavanaugh stands up for the white man Buddhist but not the black man a Muslim. I'm please to see that Justice Kavanaugh upheld the spirit of the 1st Amendment here. “[G]overnmental discrimination against religion”, he wrote, “violates the constitution”.
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
This Supreme Court ruling is exceptionally cruelCNN News, delivered. Select from our newsletters below and enter your email to subscribe. Opinion Whats cruel is raping and murdering someone. Do the crine, you pay the price. Opinion Surprised? Opinion Exceptional ❤
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
It's Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court Now, Not Anthony Kennedy'sAnalysis: The Supreme Court's post-Kennedy era may have come Monday, in the justices’ sharply divided 5-4 ruling in Bucklew v. Precythe—rejecting a Missouri death-row inmate’s claim that his execution by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment The supreme court problem is Clarence Thomas and not coming clean with his conscience. The guy probably shouldn't have killed people...could have avoided this. Outlaw the death penalty.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court affirms capital punishment despite risks of painThe Supreme Court this week, in a narrow 5-4 decision, offered a sweeping defense of the death penalty, including in cases when an inmate faces the risk of extreme pain. The pain of the victim and their families I assure you is FAR greater. MORE: 'The Eighth Amendment does not guarantee a prisoner a painless death,' Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority in the death row appeal by Missouri convict Russell Bucklew. The amendment prohibits the infliction of 'cruel and unusual punishments.' Oh well. Don’t KILL/MURDER ANYONE if you don’t want PAIN! SorryNotSorry
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »