Supreme Court upholds acquittal of Quebec man who refused breathalyzer test

  • 📰 calgarysun
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 52%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Canada\u0027s highest court has upheld the acquittal of a Quebec man who refused to provide a sample of his breath to officers who didn\u0027t have immediate access to a breathalyzer test.

Play Video

The Supreme Court of Canada says the demand was invalid because police did not have in their possession an approved screening device to test for alcohol.Sign up to receive daily headline news from the Calgary SUN, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails or any newsletter. Postmedia Network Inc.

He was found guilty by a municipal court of refusing to comply with a police order for a breath sample, but the Quebec Court of Appeal acquitted him.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 63. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court upholds acquittal of Quebec man who refused breathalyzer testCanada\u0027s highest court has upheld the acquittal of a Quebec man who refused to provide a sample of his breath to officers who didn\u0027t have immediate access to a breathalyzer test. Good. Alcohol doesn’t drive cars, people do. He should be acquitted. How can you ask someone who is walking for a breathalyzer sample?
Source: TheTorontoSun - 🏆 23. / 68 Read more »

Quebec man who refused breathalyzer test has acquittal upheld by Canada’s top court | Globalnews.caThe Supreme Court of Canada says the demand was invalid because police did not have in their possession an approved screening device to test for alcohol. This is the type of legal nonsense that will destroy democracy. Autocracy must gain momentum to keep the populace in check. Too many lawyers, liberal thinking that a person has greater rights then the safety of society is like a cancer within democracy. Good. The police have to much power.
Source: GlobalNational - 🏆 81. / 51 Read more »

Globe editorial: The Supreme Court dropped the ball on private health careThe Court had a chance to resolve important legal contradictions, but for inexplicable reasons it has chosen to let a confusing situation continue in Canada Postmedia organization in bio. Let me correct the title here : “Trudeau has dropped multiple balls” Fly away ghoul
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Ian Mulgrew: Supreme Court of Canada ducks on providing needed guidance on medicareOpinion: Supreme Court\u0027s decision in health\u002Dcare case is a win for lack of accountability in the public sector
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »

Lawsuit against local firm deemed abuse of processPlaintiff had already received award from Civil Resolution Tribunal before turning to B.C. Supreme Court
Source: PGCitizen - 🏆 65. / 51 Read more »

Bogus 'cut and paste' claims for refugees by Quebec lawyer blasted as 'egregious incompetence'When an Iranian couple went to a refugee hearing, the IRB was told that 23 nearly identical claims mirrored the couple’s claim Really not that uncommon... Oh FakeGPT did it, true?
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »