Play Video
The Supreme Court of Canada says the demand was invalid because police did not have in their possession an approved screening device to test for alcohol.From our newsroom to your inbox at noon, the latest headlines, stories, opinion and photos from the Toronto Sun.By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails or any newsletter.
He was found guilty by a municipal court of refusing to comply with a police order for a breath sample, but the Quebec Court of Appeal acquitted him.
He should be acquitted. How can you ask someone who is walking for a breathalyzer sample?
Good. Alcohol doesn’t drive cars, people do.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Quebec man who refused breathalyzer test has acquittal upheld by Canada’s top court | Globalnews.caThe Supreme Court of Canada says the demand was invalid because police did not have in their possession an approved screening device to test for alcohol. This is the type of legal nonsense that will destroy democracy. Autocracy must gain momentum to keep the populace in check. Too many lawyers, liberal thinking that a person has greater rights then the safety of society is like a cancer within democracy. Good. The police have to much power.
Source: GlobalNational - 🏆 81. / 51 Read more »
Opinion: Canadians are the biggest losers in the Supreme Court’s latest health care decisionOnly in Canada can the top court give Quebeckers special privileges when it comes to their health and deny those same rights to B.C. The 'privilege' here is the ability to spend one's own money on needed health services the government fails or refuses to provide, rather than being forced by law to do without this needed health care. Some 'privilege'. It's hard to imagine a more basic economic right. suekings35 True, but many in the media in this country, including your paper, have done little to challenge the thinking around healthcare. The Globe is by and large a 'safe space' for readers that prefers to coddle with politically correct nonsense rather than to challenge. Imagine suggesting that spending my own $$ to procure the essential health care I'm effectively denied by the state is a 'privilege' this is liberal_party ndp SCC_CSC totalitarianism only Orwell could envision
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Globe editorial: The Supreme Court dropped the ball on private health careThe Court had a chance to resolve important legal contradictions, but for inexplicable reasons it has chosen to let a confusing situation continue in Canada Postmedia organization in bio. Let me correct the title here : “Trudeau has dropped multiple balls” Fly away ghoul
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Ian Mulgrew: Supreme Court of Canada ducks on providing needed guidance on medicareOpinion: Supreme Court\u0027s decision in health\u002Dcare case is a win for lack of accountability in the public sector
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »
Lawsuit against local firm deemed abuse of processPlaintiff had already received award from Civil Resolution Tribunal before turning to B.C. Supreme Court
Source: PGCitizen - 🏆 65. / 51 Read more »
Bogus 'cut and paste' claims for refugees by Quebec lawyer blasted as 'egregious incompetence'When an Iranian couple went to a refugee hearing, the IRB was told that 23 nearly identical claims mirrored the couple’s claim Really not that uncommon... Oh FakeGPT did it, true?
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »