Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis said he would also very likely tap an outside investigator to probe Fox's late disclosure of the evidence and take whatever steps necessary to remedy the situation, which he described as troubling, the person said.Fox said in a statement that it "produced the supplemental information" to Dominion "when we first learned it."
in 2021. It accused them of ruining its reputation by airing false claims by Trump and his lawyers that the Denver-based company's voting machines were used to rig the outcome of the election against him and in favor of Democrat Joe Biden. Grossberg said in her latest filing that she has tapes of former Trump lawyers, including Giuliani, conceding they lacked evidence for their claims. The recordings and transcripts of them were widely circulated and discussed within Fox, Grossberg added." after it disclosed for the first time in nearly two years of litigation that Rupert Murdoch was an officer of the company. As a Fox News officer, Murdoch would likely have been subject to more probing discovery by Dominion.
You can't go around spouting lies, then try to hide behind the freedom of the press. If it is a lie, then it is a lie, even when you tart up the lie up in half truths.
LMFAO
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Fox Corp. Seen Withholding Evidence in Run-Up to Dominion Voting TrialA judge overseeing a much-scrutinized defamation trial brought by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News and its corporate parent has admonished attorneys for the media company several times this… They lie all the time on the air. You really think they didn't lie in that particular situation? LOL...
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »
Judge, Fox attorney clash over TV hosts' testimony in Dominion defamation caseNEW: A lawyer representing Fox News against Dominion's defamation suit clashed with the judge over how some of the network's top stars can be questioned on the witness stand. Typically when lawyers clash with Judges, the Judge wins. Love it - 'If you have Fox hosts testify that they didn't say these things, I'll turn to the jury and say you are (lying)'. Brutal. You do not “clash” with a judge. In the end, you obey the rules that the court puts in place or you will have a very bad day.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Judge bars Dominion from mentioning Jan. 6 riot in Fox defamation trialDelaware Judge Eric M. Davis said the trial is not centered on whether comments on Fox inspired the insurrectionists Every hour, every day for weeks on Faux: 'The election was stolen!! Trump won!!!' Faux news in court: We didn't do anything. Nope, not us. Trumps 2024 Where the hell is the ACLU here? 👇🏼
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Dominion can discuss general threats in Fox defamation trialThe judge presiding over a voting machine company’s defamation lawsuit against Fox News for airing bogus allegations of fraud in the 2020 presidential election has indicated he will allow jurors to hear some testimony about threats directed at the company, but only to a point
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Dominion Can’t Bring Up Jan. 6 at Fox News Trial, Judge RulesA judge ruled Tuesday that lawyers for Dominion Voting Systems may not mention the Jan. 6 Capitol riot during its forthcoming defamation trial against Fox News. There’s correlation so that makes sense to me. It was a mostly peaceful protest. Like March 30. Only difference; democrats are above the law. Momof4Cats4 This is a correct ruling. The court already held the info was false. The sole remaining issue is whether fox knowingly or with reckless disregard of whether it was or wasn’t false, spewed the falsehoods. If so, damages to Dominion are determined. Everything else is immaterial.
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »