Supreme Court Justices Hesitant to Upend Section 230 in Google Case

  • 📰 AllSidesNow
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Supreme Court justices appeared wary of making major changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. See potential bias and similarities in coverage from FoxNews, verge and SCOTUSblog: Section230 SupremeCourt

Supreme Court justices appeared wary of making major changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, observers said — in part because of wariness over their understanding of the internet. At one point, Justice Samuel Alito said he was “completely confused” after petitioner’s counsel Eric Schnapper discussed how video thumbnail placement might be considered partly YouTube’s own speech as well as that of a third party.

” in which the plaintiffs — parents of an American college student killed in an ISIS terrorist attack — are suing Google for allegedly violating the Anti-Terrorism Act by hosting ISIS videos on YouTube. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act allows online platforms like Facebook to host content posted by third parties without bearing the legal responsibility of a “publisher” of that content. Without that protection, experts say, sites like Google couldn’t function the way they do today.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 572. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court for first time casts doubt on Section 230, the legal shield for Big TechThe legal shield known as Section 230 launched Big Tech and was largely unchallenged in the Supreme Court — until now. Any attempt to overturn 230 is a violation of the first amendment. Finding for the plaintiff puts all kinds of people at risk. Terrorist rents truck, blows up something: are the builders of the roads he used liable how about the truck manufacturer, or the rental agency?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Listen Live: Supreme Court\u0027s Section 230 case could reshape the 'fundamental architecture' of the internetYouTube's recommendations algorithm, and those used by platforms like TikTok, Facebook and Twitter, are at the heart of a legal dispute that's going to the Supreme Court. I work at Facebook doing content moderation algorithm coding. I’m sure the Supreme Court will affirm our right to protect the users from conservative hate speech!
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court sounds wary of weakening Section 230 to allow lawsuits against internet giantsSupreme Court justices were wary of allowing lawsuits over algorithims that social media giants use to direct users to related content — even if that includes terrorism. they shouldn't be able to USE algorithms to Direct Users to any Content ... the END Sure, wary about holding companies financially accountable for the business model they choose to adopt just because it happens to result in people getting hurt or murdered Suits magats to allowed to spread whatever lies they prefer.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Landmark Big Tech Section 230 CaseThe Supreme Court heard arguments today in the first case challenging critical protections for tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to be argued before the high court. Will be interesting - there are pros and cons on either side of 230. No algorithm should be used at all that is censorship and in this country we have free speech The Telecommunications Act should be abolished. Disney should not be owning so much media when they are a political weapon.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »