Several Supreme Court justices said Tuesday they were wary of allowing lawsuits against YouTube and other social media firms over algorithms they use to direct users to related content — even if that encourages terrorists or promotes illegal conduct.
She said it was very difficult to draw a line between ordinary algorithms that tell users they may be interested in similar videos and those involving illegal content that would justify a lawsuit against YouTube.Kavanaugh said some feared it “would crash the digital economy” if websites were suddenly subject to all manner of lawsuits.
The case, Gonzalez vs. Google, asked whether YouTube could be held liable for using computerized programs that “recommended” Islamic State videos to potential recruits.
What is the Constitutional issue here that SCOTUS is even involved?
Follow BFBT_ for news on spying and terrorism. We tweet daily. PeopleWatching
Suits magats to allowed to spread whatever lies they prefer.
Sure, wary about holding companies financially accountable for the business model they choose to adopt just because it happens to result in people getting hurt or murdered
they shouldn't be able to USE algorithms to Direct Users to any Content ... the END
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court for first time casts doubt on Section 230, the legal shield for Big TechThe legal shield known as Section 230 launched Big Tech and was largely unchallenged in the Supreme Court — until now. Any attempt to overturn 230 is a violation of the first amendment. Finding for the plaintiff puts all kinds of people at risk. Terrorist rents truck, blows up something: are the builders of the roads he used liable how about the truck manufacturer, or the rental agency?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Listen Live: Supreme Court\u0027s Section 230 case could reshape the 'fundamental architecture' of the internetYouTube's recommendations algorithm, and those used by platforms like TikTok, Facebook and Twitter, are at the heart of a legal dispute that's going to the Supreme Court. I work at Facebook doing content moderation algorithm coding. I’m sure the Supreme Court will affirm our right to protect the users from conservative hate speech!
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
What is Section 230, the rule that made the modern internet?A case coming before the U.S. Supreme Court this week, Gonzalez v. Google, challenges this law — namely whether tech companies are liable for the material posted on their platforms.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
What is Section 230, the rule that made the modern internet?A case coming before the U.S. Supreme Court this week, Gonzalez v. Google, challenges this law — namely whether tech companies are liable for the material posted on their platforms.
Source: cleveland19news - 🏆 70. / 68 Read more »