WASHINGTON—Supreme Court justices reacted skeptically Tuesday to claims that YouTube parent Google LLC that automatically recommended extremist recruiting videos, the first argument in a two-day round of arguments testing the liability of internet providers for material posted online.
No one is responsible for any of this. Lol EatTheRich
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Did Five Supreme Court Justices Lie to Congress About Abortion Views?'Their auditions for lifetime appointments on the highest court in the land were an affront to the rule of law and the Constitution they are sworn to uphold.' The current SCOTUS 6-3 group were carefully tested by the far-right Republican religious zealots using the Hogwarts Sorting Hat for that critical Christian value, 'Slytherin!' - cenkuygur johniadarola TYTpolitcs Thom_Hartmann Ok. Everyone who claims it isn't murder lies.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Justices Admit They Don't Know Much About Social MediaDuring oral arguments of a crucial online speech case, Google v. Gonzalez, Supreme Court justices roasted themselves and said Congress may be more tech-savvy. Supreme Court Justices, they're just like Elon Musk after all. But I do know that I love you... *gasp*
Source: Gizmodo - 🏆 556. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court justices weigh liability protections for online contentThe Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark tech case, Gonzalez v. Google, grappling for the first time with whether to make big changes in a 1996 law protecting service providers and publishers from being sued over content their users post. This is gonna kill fox 'news'. They could be responsible for the stories they post. if conservatives thought censorship was bad before this law is repealed, just wait till after 😂😂 The solution is simple SCOTUS: IF they can't be sued then why should they care what we say...and Users need to grow up...it has an off-switch....promote entrepreneurship, start your own twitter...
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Google Case Heads to Supreme Court With Powerful Internet Shield Law at StakeGoogle goes before the Supreme Court this week to defend what’s seen as a pillar of the online economy—one that is also blamed for a proliferation of harmful content If you haven't heard much from Iran these days, it's because the internet connection has reached an all time low followed by the government disruption on mobile data access. We are still fighting, we won't be silenced. IranRevolution Is this accurate news or is it false ? Nothing will happen.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear arguments on Google and Twitter’s liability for terrorists’ online postingsThe Supreme Court will hear arguments this week in a pair of cases about the legal liability of tech platforms like Google and Twitter for content posted by terrorists.
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »