Does South Carolina's decision protecting abortion mean other states will follow?

“[The decision is] building on a body of jurisprudence throughout the country, holding that state constitutions do in fact recognize and independently protect abortion rights, which is absolutely crucial without federal protection,” Genevieve Scott, senior counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights told Yahoo News.

Williams points out that while the South Carolina Constitution explicitly includes a right to privacy, “there’s no right to privacy in the text of the U.S. Constitution.” In the landmark 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut ruling that legalized contraception, the Supreme Court found there was an implied right to privacy in the Bill of Rights. Griswold then paved the way for the 1973 Roe decision on federal abortion rights.

That is part of why this is such a momentous ruling because so many of the states surrounding South Carolina are restrictive states, and already we have seen an enormous number of patients flowing in from those states. What this means is that people who are able to afford to be able to travel will be able to access care.The South Carolina decision is based on the South Carolina Constitution, so it's a matter of state law.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

South Carolina Supreme Court Strikes Down Fetal Heartbeat LawThe South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the law is unconstitutional because it violates the state constitution’s privacy protections. What about the baby's privacy? Very sad! Stealing destinies of humans…abortion is evil! How could it possibly violate privacy? I think some of those justices have been doing business with Planned Parenthood because there's no way to read the law and come up with that conclusion.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »

Court rules South Carolina’s 1st District uses racist gerrymanderA federal court ruling that orders South Carolina to redraw a Republican lawmaker's district could have a major impact on the House GOP’s agenda this term. (via TheReidOut Blog) thereidout 🤣🤣🤣 always the race card. You people get more and more pathetic. I guess it's to be excepted from propaganda activist for the regime does. ZERO CREDIBILITY thereidout Almost all GOP voting districts are gerrymandered. If TheDemocrats choose to they could have more federal judges look at their districts. thereidout Watch them drag their feet, draw another illegal boundary, wait for it, too, to be challenged in court, rinse, repeat. (See: Ohio)
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »