, who replaced retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, is also a “considerably more active questioner” than her predecessor, Jay said.
During the 1800s, when the justices heard arguments from noon to 4 p.m. without a lunch break, tables were set up behind the bench and the justices would leave one or two at a time to eat. These days there's no leaving the bench to eat during arguments, though justices sometimes duck out to go to the bathroom. In October, when the court heard back-to-back arguments in
Seth Waxman, a veteran of more than 80 Supreme Court arguments, once remarked that for Rehnquist: “The red light ended everything — absolutely everything."
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Illinois Supreme Court halts plans to eliminate cash bail and other pretrial court changesControversial provision of SAFE-T Act paused by high court to 'maintain consistent pretrial procedures throughout Illinois' You crashed how many cars and hurt how many people? Apologize, promise you won't do it again and go home? Ah this sucks They passed this unlawful bill and expected us to let it slide. It’s a fkn shame lawmakers fight more for the criminals than law abiding citizens. They make us take them to court and waste our time and money.
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »
At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesSupreme Court arguments are continuing long after a red light tells lawyers to stop
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
At the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesJustices have said in the past that lawyers' written briefs, not oral arguments, most influence their decisions, so it's unclear if the extra time is really helping them decide cases.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
At the Supreme Court, It's Taking Longer to Hear CasesWhen lawyers argue before the Supreme Court, a small white light goes on to tell them when their time is almost expired and then a red light signals when they should stop. But arguments this term are extending well beyond the red light's cue. The Supreme Court is no longer respected. They are and have been compromised for a long long time. No respect for them.
Source: NBCPhiladelphia - 🏆 569. / 51 Read more »
At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesSupreme Court arguments that usually lasted an hour in the morning have stretched well beyond two, and on many days it's long past lunchtime before the court breaks. Probably have to explain simple definitions to the ‘non-biologist’ judge that cannot even define the word ‘woman’. The wheels of justice spin slowly. The lawyers get paid by the hour so the longer it takes the more money they rake in 💰
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »