The facts about the legal battle over Title 42 and what its end could mean for U.S. border policy

Because U.S. border officials have relied on Title 42 for nearly three years, its end will pose major humanitarian and operational challenges for the government, and likely fuel a spike in migrant arrivals, at least in the short term.

Nineteen Republican-led states asked several courts to delay Title 42's rescission indefinitely, warning that chaos would ensue otherwise. After their request was denied by lower courts, the states asked the Supreme Court to intervene. The 19 Republican-led states that convinced the Supreme Court to delay Title 42's end have mainly relied on the argument that lifting it will fuel an even greater increase in migrant arrivals. But the law underpinning Title 42 does not authorize expulsions on the basis of reducing or deterring illegal migration.For nearly three years, Title 42 has been the primary border-control tool the U.S. government has relied on during an unprecedented migration crisis.

This means that most migrants who are not from Mexico or Central America's Northern Triangle do not face expulsion under Title 42, and are instead processed under U.S. immigration law, which allows them to request asylum. Oftentimes, they are released with a court notice or instructions to check in with federal immigration officials in their respective U.S. destinations.

While migration from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador dropped in the past year, the U.S. has processed record numbers of Cubans, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, Colombians, Ecuadoreans, Peruvians, Russians and other nationalities. In November, U.S. border officials processed more Nicaraguans than migrants from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador combined, an unprecedented demographic shift.

Expel ALL Illegals crossing the border.

Whether we have the law or not doesn’t matter. This administration will do nothing to stop people from coming across the border illegally. They just let them cross and release them into the interior hemorrhaging our system.

Millions crossing illegally and the media is complicit with democrats purposeful ignorance

Using 'the border issue' as nothing more than a way to divide&divvy up voters for selfish self-interested political ambition 'IS' the problem with our immigration system. What's necessary is a simple bill with the appropriate vision to solve this issue sensibly & compassionately.

They call it illegal immigration for a reason.

Needs to stay in place

It's the same problem we always see where I live. Corrupt pockets of family-owned bureaucracy getting to pick and choose arbitrarily who they serve protect, and who they bestow their blessings and success to. If you don't have some special tie youre left out and forced to beg.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules to keep Title 42 in place, so what's next?The Supreme Court has ruled to preserve Trump-era border policy Title 42 for now, but the legal battle is far from over. Eddy Carder, constitutional law professor at Prairie View A&M, joins FOX 7 Austin's John Krinjak to discuss. Of course the racist gops running that court keep a racist policy alive when it should rightfully be long past dead.
Source: fox7austin - 🏆 594. / 51 Read more »

Illinois Supreme Court halts plans to eliminate cash bail and other pretrial court changesControversial provision of SAFE-T Act paused by high court to 'maintain consistent pretrial procedures throughout Illinois' You crashed how many cars and hurt how many people? Apologize, promise you won't do it again and go home? Ah this sucks They passed this unlawful bill and expected us to let it slide. It’s a fkn shame lawmakers fight more for the criminals than law abiding citizens. They make us take them to court and waste our time and money.
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »

Illinois Supreme Court halts implementation of cashless bailControversial provision of SAFE-T Act halted by state high court. Could have done that a month ago Illinois is a one-party state. Democrats control everything, thanks to the sheep-like Chicago & Cook County voters. States Attys like Kim Foxx want only to empty jails of minority felons. That’s what this is all about, and it won’t end well. Criminals saying, 'damn'
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »

Illinois Supreme Court Blocks End of Cash Bail on Jan. 1 as State Appeals Judge's RulingJust hours before cash bail was set to be eliminated across parts of Illinois, the state’s Supreme Court stopped it from taking effect as the high court prepares to debate whether or not the pretrial release provisions are constitutional. This gives people more time to arm up.
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »

IL Supreme Court halts Pre Trial Fairness Act, preventing no cash bail provision from taking effectThe ruling means no cash bail provisions will be going into effect Jan 1, pending an appeal. Lost of revenue if they change the bail system. Millions will be lost It is a racket. It always has been. The ability to hold someone hostage until they pay. It is illegal unless you are the government. It doesn’t matter if you are guilty or not.
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »