“Just barely," Gorsuch replied to laughter from the audience. “It must not feel like it standing where you are.”The reason high court arguments are running longer goes back to a change the justices made in 2020. After the pandemic began, the justices decided to hold arguments by telephone and abandoned their typical free-for-all style of questioning. Instead, each justice got a few minutes to ask questions in order of seniority.
According to Adam Feldman, the creator of the Empirical SCOTUS blog, Jackson has spoken about 36,000 words this term while her most vocal colleague, Justice Elena Kagan, has spoken only about 24,000. “The audience could not see them eating, but they could very distinctly hear the rattle of the knives and forks,” court history expert Clare Cushman has written.
That's compared with an hour and 27 minutes for Bush v. Gore in 2001. In 2012, arguments over President Barack Obama's health care law stretched for approximately six and a half hours over three days.
The Supreme Court is no longer respected. They are and have been compromised for a long long time. No respect for them.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesSupreme Court arguments are continuing long after a red light tells lawyers to stop
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
At the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesJustices have said in the past that lawyers' written briefs, not oral arguments, most influence their decisions, so it's unclear if the extra time is really helping them decide cases.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
IL Supreme Court halts Pre Trial Fairness Act, preventing no cash bail provision from taking effectThe ruling means no cash bail provisions will be going into effect Jan 1, pending an appeal. Lost of revenue if they change the bail system. Millions will be lost It is a racket. It always has been. The ability to hold someone hostage until they pay. It is illegal unless you are the government. It doesn’t matter if you are guilty or not.
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Illinois Supreme Court Pauses Plans to Eliminate Cash Bail on Eve Before Taking EffectThe Illinois Supreme Court on Saturday posted an online notice that it is staying the Pretrial Fairness Act, the law within a broader criminal justice overhaul called the SAFE-T Act, which contains the cashless-bail change. The stay will remain in place until the justices issue a new order.
Source: wttw - 🏆 520. / 51 Read more »
Illinois Supreme Court halts plans to eliminate cash bail and other pretrial court changesControversial provision of SAFE-T Act paused by high court to 'maintain consistent pretrial procedures throughout Illinois' You crashed how many cars and hurt how many people? Apologize, promise you won't do it again and go home? Ah this sucks They passed this unlawful bill and expected us to let it slide. It’s a fkn shame lawmakers fight more for the criminals than law abiding citizens. They make us take them to court and waste our time and money.
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »