WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court is considering Moore v. Harper. It’s a case out of North Carolina that centers around a state supreme court stepping in on partisan gerrymandering of congressional maps.
That clause states, “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;”Justice Elena Kagan said, “This is a theory with big consequences.” “If the legislature engages in the most extreme forms of gerrymandering, there is no state constitutional remedy for that,” Kagan said. “This is a proposal that gets rid of the normal checks and balances on the way big governmental decisions are made in this country.”
Justice Clarence Thomas questioned lawyers for those who say the North Carolina Supreme Court was right to strike down the congressional maps.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Congressional District MapsThe Supreme Court considers whether the Constitution renders state courts powerless to remedy gerrymandered maps drawn by state legislatures Fairly misleading headline. This would rule on whether state courts can intervene if they have no power to do so in that state's constitution. Nope, but it does render them powerless for unconstitutional firearms laws, so it's time to go after gun control committees Nation wide.🇺🇸 Drawing congressional districts is a state legislative power as stated in the constitution. Black letter law. Lawyers are trying to find a way around that.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
A U.S. Supreme Court case could impact lawsuits over Utah’s congressional districtsA ruling for North Carolina’s legislature also could affect redistricting lawsuits in states ranging from Republican-led Utah to Democratic-led New Mexico.
Source: sltrib - 🏆 316. / 61 Read more »
Supreme Court hears arguments over the role of state courts in reviewing election lawsA case over a state court's rejection of North Carolina's congressional map went before the Supreme Court for oral arguments on Wednesday, with potentially huge ramifications.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Alaska Judicial Council nominates 4 for upcoming vacancy on state Supreme CourtGov. Mike Dunleavy now has 45 days to select Anchorage Superior Court Judge Dani Crosby, Department of Law attorney Kate Demarest, Fairbanks attorney Aimee Oravec or Sitka Superior Court Judge Jude Pate for the state’s highest court. AlaskaBeacon Ya right, nonpartisan lol!
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court pressed to give state legislatures more power to oversee federal electionsOne advocate opposed to North Carolina lawmakers described their theory as a 'road to tyranny.' But conservatives say state courts are too often stepping in to perform 'judicial lawmaking.'
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »