The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday for a case challenging which branches of state government have regulatory authority over elections.North Carolina Republican legislature constructed a new electoral district map that the North Carolina Supreme Court struck down, believing it to be gerrymandered and biased against democratic voters. The legislators are challenging this decision before the United States Supreme Court.
The theory stems from an interpretation of Article I, Section 4 of the United States Constitution, which states that “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Hayes: Supreme Court conservative majority is ‘high council of Fox News viewers’“Because the conservative majority has tossed away all pretense of being anything other than, essentially, a high council of Fox News viewers, they decided her case should be heard before the Supreme Court,” says Chris Hayes on the Colorado web designer case. Coming from a pundit that gets little to no coverage. It screams jealousy of his competition FOX news. Bless his little heart. NEW: Federal Judge OKs Oregon's New High-Capacity Magazine Ban Yup!
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court pressed to give state legislatures more power to oversee federal electionsOne advocate opposed to North Carolina lawmakers described their theory as a 'road to tyranny.' But conservatives say state courts are too often stepping in to perform 'judicial lawmaking.'
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs North Carolina dispute that could upend election lawThe Supreme Court will hear a major case that could upend election law as the justices consider whether to reinstate Republican-drawn congressional districts in North Carolina. 👀 doesn't matter. Republicans can't win while the FBI, DNC and Big Tech are colluding to keep evidence of democrat corruption from voters. The fact that after his wife called for this very strategy in her attempts to overthrow a free and fair election Clarence Thomas is still going to rule on this case is everything you need to know about what is wrong with our SCOTUS
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case that could reshape US election lawsSupreme Court to hear arguments in a case that experts say could dramatically alter how elections are run in the U.S.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court grapples with ‘independent state legislature’ theory in blockbuster caseThe Supreme Court is grappling today with a case that could allow state legislatures to bypass courts on election rules. John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett are the key justices to watch. FedSoc sure go their moneys worth with RadicalReligiousRightSCOTUS. How do we protect our constitutional democracy from them? I’m much more concerned about this. In other words the FederalistSociety SCOTUS minions are the ones to watch given that they were bought and paid for by the oligarchs behind the FS.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »