AdvertisementThis outpouring of opposition can be attributed, in part, to Trump’s effort to use the ISLT in service of a coup. Reasonable Republicans recognize a reality that Neal Katyal, who argued that “the blast radius” from ISLT “would sow elections chaos,” “invalidating 50 different state constitutions” and countless statutes empowering state courts to regulate elections. Katyal was in top form on Wednesday, playing both advocate and historian.
He corrected Gorsuch’s bad history when the justice accused him of defending Virginia’s three-fifths clause. He pushed back hard against Alito’s efforts to malign the North Carolina Supreme Court as an out-of-control partisan usurper, explaining that it sought to impose only “ordinary checks and balances.” And he soothed Justice Brett Kavanaugh by assuring him that there could beDon Verrilli, also opposing the ISLT, did a commendable job conveying the ahistorical nature of the doctrine.
The MOST unqualified judges, put there by a treasonous president. Expand the Supreme Court.
those religious extremists are only beholden to their corporate overlords
These judges will do whatever they want.
What a hollow statement.
The Justices always have the final say. No debate
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court hears arguments over the role of state courts in reviewing election lawsA case over a state court's rejection of North Carolina's congressional map went before the Supreme Court for oral arguments on Wednesday, with potentially huge ramifications.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court hears case of web designer who doesn't want to work on same-sex weddingsColorado, like 29 other states, requires businesses that are open to the public to offer equal access to everyone, regardless of race, religion, and sexual orientation, and gender. Lorie Smith claims the law violates her right to freedom of speech. Sooo…does she refuse to design a site if the couple has had pre-marital sex? If they’ve been divorced? If they are not of the same religion? What about atheists? 🤔slipperyslope Discrimination Well then she’s a fool and any court she be denyi by her case as a frivolous lawsuit. I designed webpages. I am not an artist I am a computer science engineer. I learned to code html and manipulate digital artwork. My clients they pay me to construct a webpage front. Operative word 'construct'
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court hearing case of Christian graphic artist who objects to same-sex wedding websitesThe designer and her supporters say that ruling against her would force artists — from painters and photographers to writers and musicians — to do work that is against their faith. This a is a bullshit case. When I was growing up Religion and Faith were good qualities for one to have. Now Religion is often used to push fear and hate. Sad…
Source: aldotcom - 🏆 82. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court grapples with Christian business owner’s objection to Colorado’s pro-LGBTQ lawThe Supreme Court grappled Monday with balancing free speech against gay rights, hearing a case involving a Colorado website designer who says she shouldn’t be compelled to violate the tenets of her faith by creating products for same-sex marriages. Speech is a right. I support her Civil rights used to be about treating everyone the same. But today some people are so used to special treatment that equal treatment is considered to be discrimination.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court justices spar in latest clash of religion and LGBTQ+ rights in ColoradoThe Supreme Court's conservative majority is sounding sympathetic to a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples. Homosexuals need to learn how to bake. Christina. Who is she?
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »