The case being argued before the high court Monday involves, a graphic artist and website designer in Colorado who wants to begin offering wedding websites. Smith says her Christian faith prevents her from creating websites celebrating same-sex marriages. But that could get her in trouble with state law. Colorado, like most other states, has what’s called a public accommodation law that says if Smith offers wedding websites to the public, she must provide them to all customers.
Five years ago, the Supreme Court heard a different challenge involving Colorado’s law and a baker, Jack Phillips, who objected to designing a wedding cake for a gay couple. That case, however, and set up a return of the issue to the high court. Phillips’ lawyer, Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom, is now representing Smith.
Like Phillips, Smith says her objection is not to working with gay people. She says she’d work with a gay client who needed help with graphics for an animal rescue shelter, for example, or to promote an organization serving children with disabilities. But she objects to creating messages supporting same-sex marriage, she says, just as she won’t take jobs that would require her to create content promoting atheism or gambling or supporting abortion.
Smith says Colorado’s law violates her free speech rights. Her opponents, including the Biden administration and groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, disagree. Twenty mostly liberal states, including California and New York, are supporting Colorado while another 20 mostly Republican states, including Arizona, Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee, are supporting Smith.If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation.
I don't know why people want to force a fascist pig to bake them a cake or make them a website. It's just going to give that person an excuse to have 15 min of fame. There are plenty of other people who believe in making money who would do the job.
I thought state rights was a thing y’all support.
All she knows is that they are gay. Doesn't matter to her if they are good people. This is why I can't get into religion when it leads to you discriminating against another human being.
'My faith dictates people shouldn't be able to make money off gay people liking our products. I should just starve and chase off potential customers because they cross swords and scissor, ew.'
The business owner should not be required to violate her religious beliefs to accommodate people who are not in step with them. I don't care what the jews say. That business owner is a modern-day Phinehas. Modern-day Phinehases should stay strong for the precepts of God.
All that and she's wearing a cotton shirt
Didn’t there used to be signs posted at private businesses that said “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.”?
This whole case is BS. The suit is over a hypothetical event, and there isn't actually anyone being forced to do anything here. She just wants to discriminate against gay couples if she ever had some as potential clients. So stupid.
When I was growing up Religion and Faith were good qualities for one to have. Now Religion is often used to push fear and hate. Sad…
This a is a bullshit case.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »