, acknowledged that the outcome was"certainly disappointing from the perspective that Charlie and David did not prevail. But it's a narrow, limited opinion just on the facts of the case. It was largely based on statements made by some members of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission" — which threw its support behind Craig and Mullins in 2014 —"and not on any inappropriate conduct by Charlie and David.
That's not the way the U.S. District Court saw it, however. The defendants in the case, including Colorado Civil Rights Commission head Aubrey Elenis and its other members, as well as Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, were granted summary judgment in September 2019, largely because the case was hypothetical: Smith filed suit before posting any statement, and no state body had punished her.
. He called the majority's opinion"staggering" and"unprecedented" because"the Constitution protects Ms. Smith from the government telling her what to say."
That is some weakass phrasing
Just another Alphabet Mafia hit job! I'm sure there are plenty of gay bakers here in California East ( formerly Colorado).
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments in Colorado same-sex discrimination caseThe case of an evangelical Christian designer from Colorado who refuses to build websites for same-sex couples lands in the U.S. Supreme Court for oral arguments. There are SO MANY MORE TALENTED WEB DESIGNERS than just her (not a slight to her), but go to them for God sakes. Acting like there's only one web/graphic designer in the world is ludicrous Next week's headline: 'Supreme Court legalizes all discrimination in historic 6-3 vote' Gee I wonder how the court of ChristianShariaLaw will rule?
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear latest clash of religion and gay rightsThe Supreme Court on Monday is hearing the case of a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples. Ah the old hiding behind religion to discriminate ploy She is the only wedding website designer Is that like Muslim owned restaurants refusing to serve people pork
Source: fox32news - 🏆 547. / 51 Read more »
Wedding websites are the latest gay rights battleground in ColoradoThe Supreme Court on Monday considers if web designer Lorie Smith’s refusal to create same-sex union sites violates Colorado's public-accommodation law. What is wrong with these people forcing their sins onto others Colorado is very narrowly interpreting what free speech is and it doesn’t apply here. SCOTUS will rule in her favor. How is a business cutting ties with an actor / actress holding political views they don’t like ok but this is not? Please explain.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
A new clash between faith and gay rights arrives at a changed Supreme CourtTen years ago, a Colorado baker turned away a gay couple, saying that a state law forbidding discrimination based on sexual orientation must yield to his faith. Now, similar case has challenged the same Colorado law via the nytimes nytimes I don’t now why any baker would turn away business from anyone. Badly run business. nytimes I'm so tired of straight people bullshit nytimes Lordy, is this the same trans lawyer that wont leave the baker alone? This is getting old, folks.
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs increasing state lawmakers’ power during electionsThe court is set to hear arguments where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court. State legislators already have plenary power over election laws and the electoral college. This is delighted to them in the US Constitution. You mean they weigh ending democracy. Who will be making the arguments? Lawyers and AGs funded by Leonard Leo. Who will be ruling? 6 Justices hand picked by Leonard Leo. Sure they do. Because the SC is illegitimate. Bought and paid for by Conservatives.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »